Palace Hotel San Francisco, San Francisco, Worn

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Palace Hotel San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

14th

Out of 493

Palace Hotel San Francisco	Average Price: $284 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2 New Montgomery Street

San Francisco, 94105 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 37
Average review rating: 4.01

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (49) , MyTravelGuide (160) , Travelocity (15) , TripAdvisor (781) , YahooTravel (35)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (10) annoy (8) apologetic (6) avoid (11) awful (11) bad (40) broken (6) complain (16) complaint (18) cramped (8) dated (16) difficult (14) dingy (6) dirty (21) disappoint (56) downside (17) expensive (99) frustrated (7) hard (18) hardly (6) horrible (9) inconvenient (10) issue (32) lack (11) loud (29) mediocre (7) mistake (7) mold (10) negative (17) noise (95) noisy (32) outdated (8) outrageous (8) overpriced (12) poor (20) pricey (37) problem (64) ridiculous (10) rude (21) shame (6) slow (14) smell (11) terrible (21) tiny (21) uncomfortable (17) unfortunate (17) unhelpful (6) worn (17) worst (17) wrong (18)

Worn	Appears in 26 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Worn:
bathroom (4) bed (9) carpet (7) comfortable (4) furnish (2) furniture (6) high (2) hot (2) hotel (5) liked (3) lobby (2) not (5) noticeable (2) old (4) room (9) shower (3) small (2) stains (3) tub (2) well (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My room was a little worn, but had very high ceilings and huge windows.

"Glamorous Vintage Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

2. The downsides are relatively small rooms and bathrooms (at least in the 'superior' rooms), somewhat worn and dirty carpet, and significant noise from adjoining rooms and from the street outside.

"Beautiful historic hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote

3. The carpet was old & worn & stained, the furniture old & scratched & the middle drawer of the dresser broken.

"Stay somewhere else " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2012 Vote

4. Their furnishings are traditional - not old and worn - and in pristine condition and the bathrooms are well designed and well lit.

"Timeless, elegant and always a pleasure " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/7/2012 Vote

5. The furnishings, carpet, and bathroom tile were worn, and the shower tile grout had mildew stains.

"Better places to stay at " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/14/2011 Vote

6. Shower/tub combo had a well worn and stained anti-slip mat.

"Grand Location, Disappointing Experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/28/2011 Vote

7. The Bed was comfortable, but the carpets were a little worn.

""The Shining" " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/18/2011 Vote

8. The rooms are a little worn, but overall a good stay.

"Expensive, a little worn, but classic. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote

9. Sheets were worn and there was even holes.

"Worn out & uncomfortable. Needs a lot of work. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/27/2011 Vote

10. Negatives: carpet in room a bit worn, breakfast at hotel restaurant WAY too expensive for kids and free coffee in lobby not very hot.

"Great pool & Great location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/7/2011 Vote