OpinionWell's Blog
Home
»
United States
»
California
»
San Francisco Destinations
»
San Francisco Hotels
»
Palace Hotel San Francisco
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
14th
Out of 493
Palace Hotel San Francisco
Average Price: $284
Check Rates
Hotel Class:
2 New Montgomery Street
San Francisco, 94105
View map
4-Star Hotel Rank:
9 of 37
Average review rating:
4.01
OpinionWell Value Index:
4
Traveler reviews analyzed:
BedBugRegistry
(
2
)
,
Expedia
(
49
)
,
MyTravelGuide
(
160
)
,
Travelocity
(
15
)
,
TripAdvisor
(
781
)
,
YahooTravel
(
35
)
SAFE TO BOOK ?
(2/5 issues found)
Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:
Construction:
No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:
Recent comments
complained about noise.
Room Smell:
No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:
Recent comments
complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:
No recent comments about bed bugs were found.
Search reviews for other problems
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
All
Positive
Negative
Keyword Search
a bit small
(10)
annoy
(8)
apologetic
(6)
avoid
(11)
awful
(11)
bad
(40)
broken
(6)
complain
(16)
complaint
(18)
cramped
(8)
dated
(16)
difficult
(14)
dingy
(6)
dirty
(21)
disappoint
(56)
downside
(17)
expensive
(99)
frustrated
(7)
hard
(18)
hardly
(6)
horrible
(9)
inconvenient
(10)
issue
(32)
lack
(11)
loud
(29)
mediocre
(7)
mistake
(7)
mold
(10)
negative
(17)
noise
(95)
noisy
(32)
outdated
(8)
outrageous
(8)
overpriced
(12)
poor
(20)
pricey
(37)
problem
(64)
ridiculous
(10)
rude
(21)
shame
(6)
slow
(14)
smell
(11)
terrible
(21)
tiny
(21)
uncomfortable
(17)
unfortunate
(17)
unhelpful
(6)
worn
(17)
worst
(17)
wrong
(18)
See more
Shame
Appears in 7 comments.
The following words were used in comments with
Shame:
hotel
(2)
not
(2)
room
(3)
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the
Most helpful
section.
Sort by:
Date
Votes
1.
This hotel is in the perfect location, which is a
shame
that it is occupied by a mediocre hotel.
"Beautiful lobby and restuarant, sub-par everything else "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
1/26/2012
Vote
2.
That was a
shame
because we had enjoyed our stay (with the exception of actually attempting to sleep) up to that point.
"HVAC Problems "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
1/12/2012
Vote
3.
Old school without being stuffy,nice larger room (although it was a
shame
that the sofa didn't convert into a sofabed) beautiful public spaces, helpful staff.
"Excellent location, upmarket feel. "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
11/7/2011
Vote
4.
A real
shame
.
"Windows Sealed Shut - A Shame; Dirty Carpet "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
11/7/2011
Vote
5.
shame
on you Starwood for calling this a Cat 6.
"Worst Category 6 Hotel Ever "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
8/6/2011
Vote
6.
Our room looked out onto 2 brick walls which was a
shame
as it was our first time in San Francisco.
"Handy location "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
7/31/2008
Vote
7.
We did not bring bathing suits and could not take advantage of the lovely pool in a rooftop gazebo, which was a
shame
since the exercise room is small and crowded.
"Good spot in business district "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
10/9/2006
Vote
About Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Site Map
Tools for hotel professionals
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved