Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
14th
Out of 493

Palace Hotel San Francisco

Average Price: $284  
 
Hotel Class:
2 New Montgomery Street
San Francisco, 94105 View map  
4-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 37
Average review rating: 4.01
OpinionWell Value Index: 4
Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (49) , MyTravelGuide (160) , Travelocity (15) , TripAdvisor (781) , YahooTravel (35)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Terrible
Appears in 24 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Terrible:
bed (2)   brunch (2)   car (2)   charged (2)   famous (2)   fee (2)   food (2)   hotel (7)   not (3)   park (2)   price (2)   quality (2)   room (6)   sad (2)   service (3)   sound (2)   street (2)   useful (2)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
See all
1. The service was absolutely terrible (especially for a 5 star) and the breakfast quality was quite low especially for the price.
"Not a 5 star - Very Disappointing " Read full review on TripAdvisor   4/20/2012 Vote      
2. My only complaints - the bathroom was a little dated, but not terrible given that the building is over 100 years old and they charged a ridiculous fee for wifi - they shouldn't be charging at all given the room rates and they make you pay an extra fee for the highest download speed.
"Classy old hotel, a little pricey for what you get " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/30/2012 Vote      
3. We did the ritz and the food there was terrible.
"Treated me well " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/7/2012 Vote      
4. I stayed there for the Nike marathon and had a terrible noisy room.
"Treated me well " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/7/2012 Vote      
5. Regis because we were so terribly disappointed in the hotel.
"Worst Category 6 Hotel Ever " Read full review on TripAdvisor   8/6/2011 Vote      
6. The common spaces were well kept, but the guest rooms were terrible.
"Needs Updating " Read full review on TripAdvisor   4/3/2011 Vote      
7. They are a terrible face for the hotel.
"Great stay at Palace with some problems " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/31/2011 Vote      
8. terrible.
"An Absolute NO NO!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   12/13/2010 Vote      
9. terrible.
"An Absolute NO NO!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   12/13/2010 Vote      
10. terrible and horrible room sound wall.
"An Absolute NO NO!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   12/13/2010 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved