Doubletree Guest Suites Times Square, New York City, Uncomfortable

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Doubletree Guest Suites Times Square

OpinionWell
Rank

9th

Out of 676

Doubletree Guest Suites Times Square	Average Price: $474 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1568 Broadway

New York City, 10036-8201 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 154
Average review rating: 4.33

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (54) , MyTravelGuide (40) , Travelocity (31) , TripAdvisor (1846) , YahooTravel (66)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (18) avoid (20) awful (16) bad (75) bed bugs (17) big deal (10) broken (9) chipped (96) complain (22) complaint (54) cramped (19) dated (11) delay (9) difficult (18) dirty (18) disappoint (74) disturbing (31) downside (21) expensive (143) hard (55) hardly (12) hate (10) hectic (11) horrible (13) issue (79) lack (19) loud (15) mad (9) mess (9) mistake (14) negative (58) noise (197) noisy (51) overpriced (19) poor (20) pricey (55) problem (150) ridiculous (13) rock (26) rude (34) sad (9) shock (13) slow (33) smell (24) terrible (20) tiny (15) uncomfortable (23) unfortunate (21) unfriendly (11) wrong (33)

Uncomfortable

Appears in 25 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Uncomfortable:
area (2) bar (2) bed (12) hotel (5) night (6) old (3) room (7) sleep (6) sleeper (2) small (3) sofa (12) street (2) terrible (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. As most hotel rooms in Manhattan, this was small by Doubletree standards but not uncomfortable.

"Location, Location, Location -- plus " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

2. The room was small, but more 'cozy' than 'cramped', and the three of us had no issues aside from the uncomfortable pull out sofa.

"Central location, comfortable, clean and quiet. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/30/2012 Vote

3. While Times Square can be an uncomfortable place to stay because of the crowds, this hotel offers a nice retreat from the hustle and bustle of the street.

"some of the largest NYC rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

4. ) but the sofa sleeper turned out to be terrible - very uncomfortable.

"Great choice for me and my daughter " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

5. I had an uncomfortable night on the sleeper sofa from a combination of the ever present bar made the bed less than ideal and the girls were talking well into the night.

"New York City Short Weekend Trip Review " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2012 Vote

6. Our sofa was so uncomfortable to sleep.

"Good location, bad hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

7. , There was a bar right in the middle of pull out which made for a very uncomfortable night sleep.

"Great location.... price was right.... this time " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/10/2012 Vote

8. It was VERY uncomfortable.

"Location, location, location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/8/2012 Vote

9. We had an issue with the bed settee when we got there as it was so uncomfortable nobody could have slept on it so we ended up with our young niece in bed with us on the first night.

"Five Star Service & Staff - Fantastic Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/7/2012 Vote

10. The sofa was very uncomfortable and I couldn't sleep.

Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/21/2011 Vote