Novotel New York, New York City, Hassle

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Novotel New York

OpinionWell
Rank

130th

Out of 676

Novotel New York	Average Price: $335 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

226 West 52nd Street

New York City, 10019 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 45 of 106
Average review rating: 3.97

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (5) , Expedia (70) , MyTravelGuide (737) , Travelocity (22) , TripAdvisor (927) , YahooTravel (28)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (14) annoy (12) avoid (10) bad (38) bare (5) big deal (6) broken (12) complain (20) complaint (16) dated (20) difficult (7) dirty (34) disappoint (55) disturbing (7) downside (13) expensive (100) gross (8) hard (19) hardly (6) hassle (6) inconvenient (6) issue (43) lack (13) loud (4) mistake (6) negative (20) noise (62) noisy (13) outdated (8) overpriced (12) poor (13) pricey (25) problem (70) rock (13) rough (5) rude (26) shabby (11) shame (5) slow (17) smell (10) stained (9) terrible (7) tiny (13) uncomfortable (10) unfortunate (14) unfriendly (5) unhelpful (5) worn (10) worst (8) wrong (18)

Hassle

Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Hassle:
great (2) not (4) room (6) service (2) upgraded (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Checked in at 9pm as my flight from London was delayed, however checking in so was swift with no hassle.

"Brilliant Location, Brilliant Staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/2/2012 Vote

2. Ate breakfast there as it was included in our booking but this was a (minor) hassle each day as they still insisted on giving us the bill for food each morning & we had to point out it had already been paid.

"Gorgeous Hotel, Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/11/2012 Vote

3. Personally, I would get the Staten Island ferry (free) to sail past the Statue - I don`t think it`s worth the hassle of queuing, and I certainly wouldn`t spend the time lining up to go inside and up it.

"Good but not great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2008 Vote

4. Despite our complaint, we didn`t get moved until the next night which was a huge hassle.

"Old rooms, crowded elevator, poor packaging handling " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/11/2008 Vote

5. My room was actually not available, so I was upgraded with no hassles.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 2/4/2008 Vote

6. My room was actually not available, so I was upgraded with no hassles.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 2/4/2008 Vote

7. Ifyou`re after an amazing view, this is it but trust me it`s not worth the hassle.

"Great location but staff were terrible " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2008 Vote

8. Although the room is more like an upmarket motel, everything worked properly and nothing went wrong, so in a way it was worth the price just to save the stress and hassle.

"Pricey, but good hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/28/2007 Vote

9. My recent stay at Novetel went great, clean and smooth; especially the rapid, no hassle ck out.

"New years eve view " Read full review on Travelocity 9/1/2006 Vote

10. The service for the room was fine and generally the service throughout the hotel was fine with the exception of reception where everything seemed a hassle.

"Best of a bad bunch " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/14/2006 Vote