Flatotel, New York City, Uncomfortable

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Flatotel

OpinionWell
Rank

184th

Out of 676

Flatotel	Average Price: $356 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

135 West 52nd Street

New York City, 10019 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 64 of 106
Average review rating: 3.32

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (43) , Travelocity (7) , TripAdvisor (468) , YahooTravel (17)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Renovation.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (9) avoid (6) awful (6) bad (50) bed bugs (10) broke (6) broken (29) chipped (16) complain (25) complaint (9) dated (22) difficult (9) dingy (9) dirty (40) disappoint (44) disgust (6) downside (8) dump (8) expensive (17) filthy (7) frustrated (8) hard (40) horrible (7) inconvenient (8) issue (32) lack (11) loud (14) negative (18) noise (27) noisy (19) outdated (14) poor (21) poorly (12) problem (70) ridiculous (6) rock (12) rude (27) shock (8) slow (58) smell (39) stale (13) terrible (10) tiny (12) uncomfortable (18) unfortunate (6) unfriendly (7) weird (7) worn (17) worst (10) wrong (9)

Uncomfortable

Appears in 21 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Uncomfortable:
bed (9) chair (2) cold (2) decent (2) dirty (2) furniture (3) hard (2) hotel (4) liked (2) much (2) noisy (2) not (2) pillow (2) reception (2) room (9) sleep (3) smell (2) sofa (2) weekends (2) worn (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Standards in NY are different but really, you don't have to stay in a dirty and uncomfortable hotel, you can easily find a hotel at similar cost that is much nicer.

"Dirty and uncomfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2012 Vote

2. Although the room was a decent size, it was sparsely furnished and the configuration made it uncomfortable to sit anywhere but on the bed.

"Location, good sized room, but not much else. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/30/2011 Vote

3. The bed itself was pretty uncomfortable.

"Flat Out Awful...Elevator Panel Fell on My Head... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/22/2011 Vote

4. Overall I enjoyed my trip and my stay, but again, b/c of the hard mattress and uncomfortable sleep, I would not return.

"Great Location, but hotel needs work " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/14/2011 Vote

5. I just didn't sleep well b/c it was so uncomfortable.

"Great Location, but hotel needs work " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/14/2011 Vote

6. The room was dirty and needed refurbishing, smelled like an ashtray, and had an uncomfortable bed.

"Disappointment " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/6/2011 Vote

7. very uncomfortable and felt very fortunate we chose the other room.

"Nice hotel, few problems with room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/1/2011 Vote

8. It was cold during my weekend in New York and the room was uncomfortably cold.

"Can’t beat the location for New Year’s Eve! " Read full review on Expedia 1/10/2010 Vote

9. It was decently hot in NY that weekend and it was uncomfortable in the room at all times.

"its ok. " Read full review on Expedia 8/26/2009 Vote

10. Room smelled like smoking was previously allowed, noisy air conditioner, uncomfortable flat bed, worn carpet, no full-length mirror, one wash cloth for 2 adults, cramped quarters, unexplained noises.

"Very dissappointing. " Read full review on Expedia 6/29/2009 Vote