InterContinental The Barclay New York, New York City, Worn

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » InterContinental The Barclay New York

OpinionWell
Rank

40th

Out of 676

InterContinental The Barclay New York	Average Price: $434 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

111 East 48th Street

New York City, 10017 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 106
Average review rating: 3.81

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (23) , MyTravelGuide (2733) , Travelocity (11) , TripAdvisor (1498) , YahooTravel (28)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (11) annoy (21) avoid (26) bad (80) big deal (10) bit dated (13) broken (30) chipped (18) complain (49) complaint (32) cramped (10) dated (28) difficult (17) dirty (38) disappoint (67) downside (12) errors (11) expensive (118) hard (33) hassle (9) horrible (15) issue (76) lack (26) loud (21) mold (18) negative (37) noise (164) noisy (53) outdated (24) overpriced (10) peeling (13) poor (40) pricey (29) problem (111) ridiculous (15) rock (16) rude (60) shabby (12) shock (11) slow (25) smell (42) stained (17) terrible (25) tiny (58) unfortunate (28) unfriendly (9) unpleasant (9) worn (32) worst (23) wrong (22)

Worn	Appears in 75 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Worn:
alarm (4) bathroom (13) carpet (24) chipped (6) clean (5) dirty (9) furnish (5) furniture (9) good (4) need (7) nice (3) old (17) room (36) service (3) sheets (4) small (6) staff (5) stains (5) suite (5) well (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My rooms (I stayed in two different rooms, as mentioned below), although big for NY standards, were worn-out.

"OK experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

2. Things are getting a bit shabby, chipping paint, worn carpet, that kind of thing.

"Elegant Old Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

3. On arrival to the second room (which was just a slightly larger version of the previous room) the toilet seat was broken, the bathroom had been vandalised, wallpaper was peeling and was generally well worn, but was cleaned to a good standard.

"Good Location, Good Service, Dated Rooms... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/22/2012 Vote

4. I am mystified about remarks concerning worn fixtures and fittings.

"Christmas break in New York " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/8/2012 Vote

5. The elevator is worn out, the little servicing door inside the elevator on the bottom right was broken.

"Not worthy... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2012 Vote

6. Feels morn worn than classic.

"Overpriced, no point staying here. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/31/2011 Vote

7. The carpet seemed worn and stained.

"Nice sized room but worn carpet and non-working coffee maker. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/17/2011 Vote

8. Carpet looked worn and old.

"Time to drop one of those stars " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

9. The furniture was old and worn, and the bathroom left a lot to be desired - shower didn't work properly and it had a large public toilet rather than a normal one.

"Hotel a bit run down but good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/15/2011 Vote

10. The towels were worn and had holes.

"DO NOT STAY HERE........ OVERPRICED DATED ROOMS THEY WILL OVERBILL YOU..... BUREAUCRATIC NIGHTMARE " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/2/2011 Vote