On The Ave Hotel, New York City, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » On The Ave Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

24th

Out of 676

On The Ave Hotel	Average Price: $314 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2178 Broadway

New York City, 10024 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 10 of 154
Average review rating: 3.89

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (44) , MyTravelGuide (25) , Travelocity (14) , TripAdvisor (1779) , YahooTravel (24)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (12) annoy (12) avoid (18) awful (10) bad (62) bed bugs (29) big deal (14) broken (32) complain (38) complaint (44) cramped (12) difficult (19) dirty (32) disappoint (70) downside (25) expensive (62) filthy (10) hard (61) hassle (11) horrible (13) inconvenient (15) issue (86) lack (40) loud (51) mistake (14) mold (16) negative (44) noise (174) noisy (50) overpriced (13) poor (27) pricey (19) problem (138) ridiculous (12) rock (12) rude (27) shame (11) shock (11) slow (99) smell (57) stain (10) tear (9) terrible (21) tiny (63) uncomfortable (10) unfortunate (40) worn (24) worst (22) would have liked (10) wrong (28)

Bad	Appears in 84 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
bed (5) experience (4) good (5) great (4) hotel (14) liked (5) location (7) never (5) night (4) noise (5) noisy (3) not (23) reception (4) reviews (3) room (30) service (4) small (7) smell (5) staff (4) street (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The construction, at the time of our stay, was ground level so it wasn't too bad for us.

"I would stay here again ... but ... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2012 Vote

2. There is a building being constructed directly across the street and we were concerned about the noise factor but given that we were on the 11th floor it wasn't too bad actually.

"I would stay here again ... but ... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2012 Vote

3. The hotel is on a side street so the noise factor wasn't too bad.

"Hidden Gem on the Upper West Side " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

4. Rooms are alright and service not bad.

"Good enough hotel in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/18/2012 Vote

5. Too bad the management had him pulling double duty AND he was there from when we checked in that morning until we came back at 10:30 that night.

"Not as advertised " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/15/2012 Vote

6. they forget to put towels in my room and I had to go to reception to have some towels, very bad experience I will not go that hotel anymore.

"very bad service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

7. Too bad I wasn't there for a week.

"A Wonderful Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/11/2012 Vote

8. I'm really bad at sleeping with earplugs so every half an hour or so when the heating unit fired up it woke me.

"Loved the location. The air con/heating left me with no sleep! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/31/2011 Vote

9. The location is not bad - the upper west and 2 blocks from the A subway station.

"nice hotel, quite basic " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/28/2011 Vote

10. It was so obviously bad, that I can't imagine that management inspects rooms on any timetable that would be representative of a well-managed hotel.

"Poor excuse of a boutique hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/27/2011 Vote