Hilton Riverside Hotel New Orleans, New Orleans, Slow

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Louisiana » New Orleans Destinations » New Orleans Hotels » Hilton Riverside Hotel New Orleans

OpinionWell
Rank

15th

Out of 427

Hilton Riverside Hotel New Orleans	Average Price: $281 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2 Poydras Street

New Orleans, 70140 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 125
Average review rating: 3.89

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (5) , Expedia (68) , Travelocity (1) , TripAdvisor (1000) , YahooTravel (36)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (14) avoid (21) awful (7) bad (80) bed bugs (11) broken (15) complain (35) complaint (30) damage (8) dated (9) difficult (10) dirty (21) disappoint (45) disturbing (9) downside (13) expensive (79) frustrated (12) gross (8) hard (28) hassle (9) horrible (13) inconvenient (16) issue (76) lack (24) loud (26) mediocre (7) mess (6) mistake (8) mold (6) negative (29) noise (57) noisy (17) outrageous (12) overpriced (23) poor (17) poorly (8) pricey (30) problem (107) ridiculous (18) rude (21) shock (6) slow (27) smell (38) terrible (16) tiny (13) unfortunate (20) unhelpful (7) worn (8) worst (13) wrong (26)

Slow	Appears in 31 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Slow:
bar (4) bathroom (2) bill (2) breakfast (4) desk (3) elevator (3) extremely (4) floor (3) good (6) hotel (7) large (2) new (3) not (4) room (6) rude (2) service (14) sink (2) sports (2) staff (2) waitress (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Caveat: at slow times they will help drunk patrons trade in large bills for $1 bills, slowing the line.

"Waste of travel funds " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

2. Room service is slow at times.

"Great views " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

3. The hotel restaurants were just average, and service for breakfast was terribly slow and our waitress was downright rude.

"Large hotel close to most desirable areas " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

4. Service was a little on the slow side that day.

"Average Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/14/2012 Vote

5. The security response was slow and incredibly nonchalant like this happened everyday.

"TRAVELERS BEWARE - YOU ARE NOT SAFE!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/16/2012 Vote

6. It is a large property (too big for its own good) where staff is underqualified, slow to react and lacking motivation.

"Appalling in every way. Stay elsewhere! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2011 Vote

7. Service in the hotel bar was slow, and the bartender didn't know how to make some of my boyfriend's drinks, but other than that minor inconvenience, it was an awesome trip.

"Great Place " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/5/2011 Vote

8. Parking is PRICEY, and service to get the vehicle can be slow (give them 20 minutes).

"Good place. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/24/2011 Vote

9. Down sides were that valet parking was always slow to retrieve our car (even when we called ahead of time) and the wifi for the room was pricy.

"Nice, average place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/17/2011 Vote

10. My only complaints are that the elevators are old and slow and my room was not cleaned on the second day until after 5pm.

"Nothing fancy, older hotel, good food, near casino! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/3/2011 Vote