Hilton Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Slow

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Los Angeles Destinations » Los Angeles Hotels » Hilton Los Angeles

OpinionWell
Rank

17th

Out of 700

Hilton Los Angeles	Average Price: $153 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

5711 West Century Boulevard

Los Angeles, 90045 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 84
Average review rating: 3.45

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (10) , Expedia (78) , MyTravelGuide (1187) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (791) , YahooTravel (6)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (8) avoid (16) awful (10) bad (65) bed bugs (9) big deal (8) broken (12) chipped (7) complain (18) complaint (29) damage (7) dated (41) delay (8) difficult (13) dingy (9) dirty (22) disappoint (34) disturbing (10) downside (11) expensive (66) frustrated (9) hard (33) hardly (8) hassle (14) hate (10) horrible (12) inconvenient (8) issue (50) lack (14) loud (25) mediocre (8) negative (22) noise (124) noisy (32) outdated (17) overpriced (15) poor (22) pricey (13) problem (72) rude (12) slow (31) smell (30) stained (15) terrible (17) tiny (16) unfortunate (20) weird (7) worn (18) worst (25) wrong (24)

Slow	Appears in 54 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Slow:
airport (2) clerk (3) desk (6) elevator (7) food (5) garage (3) helpful (3) hotel (9) internet (4) not (3) park (12) reservation (2) room (9) service (13) shuttle (4) smoke (4) staff (5) valet (7) wifi (3) wireless (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. 95 per device and was somewhat slow and inconsistent from time to time - I prefer an ethernet connect so that I can set up an ad hoc wifi for my devices, rather than being double billed - but I suppose this is why they make you go through the wifi.

"Quiet and comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

2. One other negative- the elevators from the parking garage are super slow and always one of them is out of order being worked on.

"A good business hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

3. Check out was very slow, with only two desk clerks - one of which was bogged down with an irate client.

"Surprisingly disappointing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/9/2012 Vote

4. It was surprising how slow things happened there.

"Hard to find service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/30/2012 Vote

5. Wifi is very week and slow.

"Only if the price is right! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/17/2011 Vote

6. The bar menu seemed reasonable, but the food that arrived was mediocre and service was incredibly slow.

"Nice lobby, dissapointing rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/11/2011 Vote

7. The check in staff was very friendly but the process was quite slow.

"Not impressed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/11/2011 Vote

8. Check-in can sometimes be slow due to the high volume of travelers.

"Great hotel for the business traveler " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/27/2011 Vote

9. The service in the Bistro (24-hour restaurant & Starbucks coffee) was slow--they seemed completely unprepared for handling a large conference.

"Kind of average, food choices were disappointing & pricey " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/17/2011 Vote

10. The only con is that there were 6 elevators on my side of the bldg but they ran very slow.

"Convenient Location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/14/2011 Vote