Fairmont San Francisco, San Francisco, Bit Dated

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Fairmont San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

8th

Out of 493

Fairmont San Francisco	Average Price: $290 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

950 Mason Street

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 37
Average review rating: 4.19

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (77) , MyTravelGuide (2) , Travelocity (10) , TripAdvisor (885) , YahooTravel (39)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (20) avoid (19) bad (46) big deal (11) bit dated (6) broken (10) complain (25) complaint (21) cramped (7) dated (22) difficult (15) dirty (19) disappoint (80) downside (26) expensive (113) frustrated (6) hard (23) hardly (7) hassle (6) inconvenient (5) issue (42) lack (16) loud (17) mediocre (10) mistake (10) mold (12) negative (23) noise (48) noisy (25) outrageous (8) overpriced (20) peeling (9) poor (16) pricey (29) problem (57) ridiculous (10) rude (14) shabby (6) shame (10) shock (6) slow (18) smell (22) snooty (7) tacky (7) terrible (14) tiny (8) unfortunate (23) unhelpful (5) worn (12) wrong (21)

Bit dated

Appears in 6 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bit dated:
bathroom (2) hotel (2) room (6)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The building outside is impressive but the interiors are a bit dated.

"Impressive lobby interiors if you're into old world gilded architecture " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/26/2012 Vote

2. The main building is a bit dated, but the tower is a bit newer.

"Central Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/17/2012 Vote

3. I would imagine some people would find the rooms a bit dated, but the hotel is over a hundred years old so we felt it just added to the overall vibe of the place.

"Classic " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/18/2011 Vote

4. My last trip, we had a corner room with City views: quality bed, linens, seating and desk - the bathrooms are a bit dated (sorry Fairmont), but in every other aspect the rooms are splendid.

"Elegant, Sophisticated - Spectacular SF Views " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/12/2011 Vote

5. Rooms are a bit dated as most Fairmonts are (smaller bathrooms in standard rooms), but I love the history of the chain.

"Great location for seeing San Fran from the top of the hill! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/10/2009 Vote

6. Some of the facilities (the 1970s Tower extension) are a bit dated, but generally, it is a very good hotelWhen we arrived at the hotel very late (around midnight), because our plane was delayed, we were no longer given a room in the historic part (as booked), but the tower.

"Good hotel with smooth service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/22/2008 Vote