Sofitel New York, New York City, Annoy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Sofitel New York

OpinionWell
Rank

11th

Out of 676

Sofitel New York	Average Price: $445 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

45 West 44th Street

New York City, 10036 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 106
Average review rating: 4.76

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (38) , MyTravelGuide (715) , Travelocity (19) , TripAdvisor (881) , YahooTravel (24)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (4) a bit small (6) annoy (12) avoid (9) bad (34) bed bugs (5) big deal (6) broken (12) complain (15) complaint (15) dated (7) delay (10) difficult (11) disappoint (74) downside (17) expensive (121) hard (17) hassle (8) hate (5) horrible (7) inconvenient (4) irritate (11) issue (49) lack (19) loud (11) mediocre (4) mistake (9) negative (29) noise (75) noisy (17) outrageous (4) overpriced (17) poor (9) pricey (33) problem (57) rock (10) rude (14) sadly (5) shame (5) slow (17) smell (29) stain (8) tear (5) terrible (5) tiny (14) too small (6) unfortunate (22) worn (11) worst (7) wrong (17)

Annoy

Appears in 12 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Annoy:
nice (3) noise (2) not (3) room (2) wifi (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The need to login to wifi every day during your stay is a bit of annoying.

"Comfortable stay, excellent service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

2. However, there are some annoying drawbacks to the elegance.

"Great location with some quirks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

3. This was incredibly annoying and an absolute deal breaker to me ever coming back here again.

"Pretty hotel, but lack of cell phone coverage was odd and frustrating. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/12/2011 Vote

4. You have to pay for wifi in the rooms (which I find a little annoying in this day and age) but there are 3 computers with free internet access in the lobby.

"Everything you could ask for " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/15/2010 Vote

5. It was rather annoying.

"still a great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/29/2010 Vote

6. We find duvets annoying and our request for a top sheet after our first night was promptly taken care of.

"Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2010 Vote

7. It's only annoying for the guests.

"Almost everything is perfect! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/14/2009 Vote

8. I was also annoyed considering that the upgrade/breakfast offer was what made me decide to book the Sofitel in the first place.

"Nice hotel, but...... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/27/2009 Vote

9. The bathroom was particularly nice, with a separate tub and shower (however, the handmitts instead of washcloths were a little annoying (although a nice little touch of exoticness)).

"Great hotel in great location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/29/2009 Vote

10. We dined out in some of the well-known eateries in the area during our stay and returned one evening to the very nice hotel bar (The only part of the service which was not up to scratch with a surly barwoman who seemed annoyed to have to make a couple of mojitos - but that would not put either of us off - everyone can have an off day.

"Very nice room, good service and central location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2009 Vote