Outrigger Waikiki on the Beach, Honolulu, Terrible

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Hawaii » Honolulu Destinations » Honolulu Hotels » Outrigger Waikiki on the Beach

OpinionWell
Rank

2nd

Out of 165

Outrigger Waikiki on the Beach	Average Price: $337 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2335 KALAKAUA AVE Honolulu

Honolulu, View map

0-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 68
Average review rating: 4.37

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (104) , MyTravelGuide (45) , Travelocity (60) , TripAdvisor (1445) , YahooTravel (184)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (16) annoy (34) avoid (29) awful (15) bad (98) big deal (14) bit dated (7) complain (51) complaint (49) cramped (7) dated (44) difficult (17) dirty (10) disappoint (94) disturbing (14) downside (19) expensive (96) frustrated (9) hard (62) hardly (16) hassle (12) hate (7) horrible (7) issue (73) lack (8) loud (102) mistake (7) negative (47) noise (303) noisy (117) outdated (17) overpriced (14) poor (16) pricey (32) problem (176) ridiculous (10) rock (29) rude (28) shock (12) slow (38) smell (18) smoker (7) terrible (24) tiny (30) too small (7) uncomfortable (9) unfortunate (25) weird (7) worst (18) wrong (20)

Terrible

Appears in 30 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Terrible:
area (2) bed (5) convenient (2) expense (2) floor (2) food (3) good (3) hotel (11) nice (2) night (5) noise (2) not (7) party (2) pool (3) quiet (2) reservation (3) room (10) service (3) view (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. One other negative was that the bed wasn't the most comfortable, but not terrible.

"Excellent location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2012 Vote

2. The one and major downfall of the hotel is the pool area, the pool itself is fine and nice and deep, however, the lounge area around the pool is terrible.

"Best Location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/6/2012 Vote

3. What a pity the rooms are terrible.

"Fantastic location, pity about the rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/29/2011 Vote

4. The beds were terrible.

"Great Location but amenities are not up to par " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/13/2011 Vote

5. We were in a lower level city view room, closest to the street, and while the music was loud into the evening, it wasn't terribly bothersome if you left your patio door closed.

"location, location, location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2011 Vote

6. And of course given the terrible service, the staff got angry for not getting a tip.

"Tired and passed used by date " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/31/2011 Vote

7. I had a terrible first night with my neighbours being twenty 15-year olds who were somehow allowed to have a party in their room next door, equaling nightmares for me that night.

"Very loud. Should not allow 15 year olds to throw drunken parties. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/11/2010 Vote

8. Not terrible, but it was a convenience at the least.

"Great location, view & service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/27/2010 Vote

9. But terrible if you prefer quiet and relaxing setting, or if you have to drive.

"Not a 4-star hotel.... " Read full review on Expedia 9/2/2009 Vote

10. My husband and I stayed at this hotel on our recent visit to Hawaii and i must say I was terribly disappointed and upset.

"Great location, terrible hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2009 Vote