Marriott Wardman Park, Washington DC, Inconvenient

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Marriott Wardman Park

OpinionWell
Rank

48th

Out of 279

Marriott Wardman Park	Average Price: $381 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2660 Woodley Road, NorthWest

Washington DC, 20008 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 23 of 58
Average review rating: 3.62

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (14) , Expedia (30) , Travelocity (8) , TripAdvisor (519) , YahooTravel (27)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (9) avoid (7) awkward (9) bad (46) bed bugs (26) broken (7) complain (30) complaint (14) cramped (6) dated (6) difficult (14) dirty (14) disappoint (41) disturbing (5) downside (8) expensive (62) frustrated (8) hard (29) hardly (6) hate (5) horrible (9) inconvenient (15) irritate (6) issue (36) lack (17) loud (16) mistake (7) mold (6) negative (14) noise (40) noisy (24) overpriced (33) poor (23) pricey (15) problem (65) ridiculous (12) rock (12) rude (21) shock (4) slow (19) smell (12) terrible (22) tiny (14) unacceptable (4) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (15) weird (7) worn (6) worst (14) wrong (12)

Inconvenient

Appears in 17 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Inconvenient:
bar (2) floor (3) hotel (5) huge (3) internet (2) location (3) not (4) pool (2) room (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. For my inconvenience they gave me special one time access to their concierge lounge.

"Huge but decent place " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

2. Otherwise, it is vast, grossly inefficient and located in an inconvenient neighborhood.

"Not good location, value or service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

3. Talk about inconvenient.

"Washington Conference " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/21/2011 Vote

4. (Although it was inconvenient to find that the 'wet bar' wasn't wet at all--there was no sink.

"Quality is declining a bit, but problems handled well " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/13/2011 Vote

5. One gripe was the vending machine on our floor that didn't work, but that was a minor inconvenience.

"A very nice hotel in a wonderful location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/13/2011 Vote

6. Second, cell reception is spotty in the majority of the hotel; I rarely got a signal where my room was located, which was inconvenient to say the least.

"Great hotel, but not for the budget-minded! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/25/2011 Vote

7. Because my companions objected to the inconvenience of changing rooms, I requested a cot to sleep in.

Read full review 4/20/2011 Vote

8. The hotel is huge and spread out, so that can be a little inconvenient.

"Not too bad.... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/16/2009 Vote

9. Pool is inconveniently located, therefore, did not even use it during five day stay.

"Overpriced and a little disappointing. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/30/2009 Vote

10. The pool in the hotel is large and clean, although as I say it's a bit inconvenient to get to from the Wardman Tower part of the hotel.

"Hotel good overall, but Wardman Tower section has some issues " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/9/2009 Vote