Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » InterContinental Mark Hopkins San Francisco
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
294th
Out of 493

InterContinental Mark Hopkins San Francisco

Average Price: $249  
 
Hotel Class:
Number One Nob Hill
San Francisco, 94108 View map  
4-Star Hotel Rank: 35 of 37
Average review rating: 3.94
OpinionWell Value Index: 3
Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (32) , MyTravelGuide (624) , Travelocity (32) , Expedia (33) , TripAdvisor (387)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Smell
Appears in 20 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Smell:
awful (4)   bath (2)   bed (2)   broken (2)   double (2)   few (2)   good (3)   liked (7)   musty (2)   not (2)   offers (2)   phone (2)   room (26)   small (2)   smelly (2)   smoke (15)   soap (2)   toilets (2)   view (7)   walking (2)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
See all
1. This time I requested a room off the street and ended up with a rooftop view of the A/C unit with a closet that had wet carpeting smelling of cat pee.
"There are much nicer and quieter places to stay " Read full review on Expedia   10/13/2009 Vote      
2. The meeting rooms were freezing cold and smelled a bit musty (especially the Room of the Dons).
"Great location! Nice rooms. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   4/26/2009 Vote      
3. They offered either a smoking room, to which I am very allergic, I checked out that room and it smelled awful.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   6/3/2008 Vote      
4. They offered either a smoking room, to which I am very allergic, I checked out that room and it smelled awful.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   6/3/2008 Vote      
5. We had to choose between a smoking room (which smells of smoke) or a non view room (only a few rooms had no view), when we knew they had view rooms available.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   3/20/2008 Vote      
6. We had to choose between a smoking room (which smells of smoke) or a non view room (only a few rooms had no view), when we knew they had view rooms available.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   3/20/2008 Vote      
7. They were sold out of non smoking rooms and the smoking rooms didn't smell good.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   1/21/2008 Vote      
8. Though it was an older building, there was no musty or dusty smell.
"Beautiful Hotel with Elegance and History " Read full review on TripAdvisor   11/20/2007 Vote      
9. Called ahead, got the double bed smoking room I requested, however when I walked in the room smelled like as if no one had opened a window in days.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   11/20/2007 Vote      
10. Called ahead, got the double bed smoking room I requested, however when I walked in the room smelled like as if no one had opened a window in days.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   11/20/2007 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Tools for hotel professionals
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved