InterContinental Mark Hopkins San Francisco, San Francisco, Expensive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » InterContinental Mark Hopkins San Francisco

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

294th

Out of 493

InterContinental Mark Hopkins San Francisco	Average Price: $249 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

Number One Nob Hill

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 35 of 37
Average review rating: 3.94

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (33) , MyTravelGuide (624) , Travelocity (32) , TripAdvisor (387) , YahooTravel (32)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (3) annoy (3) avoid (3) bad (12) barely (5) big deal (3) complain (5) complaint (4) damage (3) dated (5) dirty (4) disappoint (21) disturbing (3) downfall (3) downside (5) expensive (23) hard (5) hardly (4) issue (8) lack (3) loud (6) mediocre (5) mistake (3) mold (2) negative (8) noise (27) noisy (10) odor (2) outrageous (5) overcharged (2) overpriced (8) poor (5) pricey (5) problem (15) ridiculous (4) rock (3) rude (7) shame (2) shock (2) slow (10) smell (2) stained (3) terrible (4) tiny (6) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (7) unhappy (2) worn (4) worst (5) wrong (4)

Expensive

Appears in 110 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Expensive:
$ (20) breakfast (10) busy (4) car (6) expense (114) food (11) garage (4) good (5) hotel (22) internet (6) nice (6) night (6) not (7) order (3) park (42) room (9) service (14) street (10) valet (4) view (9)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. What we disliked: 1) Valet parking was expensive but we found a cheaper garage (Masonic center) a couple blocks away.

"Romantic stay at a beautiful historic hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/15/2011 Vote

2. Unacceptable for a hotel this expensive.

"This is a four star hotel? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/5/2011 Vote

3. Only one negative: The internet is so poor and expensive, I don't know why they offer it.

"Beautiful Hotel from a Bygone Era " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/1/2011 Vote

4. , cable cars are expensive, slow, crowded, and a hassle.

"Great Hotel, but Housekeeping Lacks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/13/2011 Vote

5. They leave the guest ELEMIS soaps which are fairly expensive bath goodies.

"A Great Experience! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/28/2010 Vote

6. We didn't arrive by car but noted that parking is very expensive.

"Gorgeous Hotel, Excellent Location, Luxurious Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/15/2010 Vote

7. We had a breakfast at the Top of the Mark - it was expensive ($77 w/tip) but a nice spread and a wonderful view of the city.

"Would stay here again " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/13/2010 Vote

8. Knowing how expensive SF hotels can be, I was surprised to be able to get a deluxe room at the MH for little more than $100 per night.

"High quality at a bargain price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/2/2010 Vote

9. Parking is expensive but it's like that everywhere I looked in SF.

"location, accomodations and service all were excellent at this classic hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/17/2010 Vote

10. The hotel bar is definitely worth visiting, great view but expensive drinks and a limited menu.

"location, accomodations and service all were excellent at this classic hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/17/2010 Vote