Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
3rd
Out of 493

Hotel Nikko San Francisco

Average Price: $307  
 
Hotel Class:
222 Mason Street
San Francisco, 94102 View map  
4-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 37
Average review rating: 3.85
OpinionWell Value Index: 5
Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (77) , MyTravelGuide (181) , Travelocity (61) , TripAdvisor (712) , YahooTravel (30)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Negative
Appears in 32 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Negative:
$ (4)   bathroom (3)   car (3)   charged (3)   clean (4)   couple (3)   good (4)   hotel (10)   lighting (3)   never (3)   not (9)   old (2)   outdated (2)   pool (3)   positive (3)   reviews (5)   room (12)   slight (2)   small (3)   well (3)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
See all
1. I was expecting a bit more from a 4 star (although a first time for us), but do not have much negative aspects to point out as we had a very enjoyable stay.
"Enjoyable stay! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/21/2012 Vote      
2. The rooms are a good size - my only negative point was the lack of a bedside lamp or switch to turn off the main light which meant I had to go back to the entrance to turn the light off and walk back to bed in the dark - a little odd.
"Great Location, Good service " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/13/2012 Vote      
3. I'm not one to complain about little things like this but one negative point like this almost made me forget about the positives.
"Fantastic Location and Great Rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor   3/13/2012 Vote      
4. Only negative was that fitness center was an extra charge --- $20 for the stay for 2 people.
"Great stay - would definitely return here " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/31/2012 Vote      
5. The Pool unfortunately is a negative but noyt a show stopper.
"Union Sq Ideal " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/3/2012 Vote      
6. The negatives:When you dealt with hotel staff not in person, things kind of fell apart.
"It's a fine hotel, but I wouldn't go there expecting a super luxury experience. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   12/6/2011 Vote      
7. Room was well maintained, clean, my only negative is the lighting in the rooms, not too good and the lamps and lamp shades are seriously out of date, ugly, don't match the rest of the decor.
"Good value,nice room,Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor   10/26/2011 Vote      
8. The hotel was clean, rooms modern and spotless but our room was very small and with a couple of large suitcases each it did pose a bit of a problem but this is the only negative thing we have to say about the hotel.
"A Good Hotel in a Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor   10/3/2011 Vote      
9. After reading many negative reviews about this hotel, I was a little worried about what our travel agent had gotten us into for our honeymoon trip no less.
"If I ever go back to SF, I will stay here again! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   8/27/2011 Vote      
10. There was never a negative vibe, edginess or feeling of crowds that I sometimes find in big, centrally-located 'name' hotels.
"Simply pleasant " Read full review on TripAdvisor   8/24/2011 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Tools for hotel professionals
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved