Hotel Nikko San Francisco, San Francisco, Horrible

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Hotel Nikko San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

3rd

Out of 493

Hotel Nikko San Francisco	Average Price: $307 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

222 Mason Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 37
Average review rating: 3.85

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (77) , MyTravelGuide (181) , Travelocity (61) , TripAdvisor (712) , YahooTravel (30)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (6) annoy (9) avoid (15) awful (5) bad (30) complain (17) complaint (24) cramped (6) damage (4) dated (5) difficult (4) dirty (10) disappoint (35) disturbing (8) downside (13) expensive (52) hard (11) horrible (7) irritate (3) issue (18) lack (6) loud (5) mess (7) mistake (4) negative (18) noise (39) noisy (13) outdated (3) overpriced (7) poor (11) pretty small (4) pricey (11) problem (37) ridiculous (6) rough (3) rude (6) slow (4) smell (7) sophisticated (3) stained (4) terrible (9) tiny (6) too small (5) ugly (5) uncomfortable (5) unfortunate (10) unhelpful (3) worn (7) worst (6) wrong (10)

Horrible

Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Horrible:
hotel (2) not (3) room (2) service (5)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. I immediately became aware of the time felt horrible, but instead they were so nice and said not to worry and didn't rush us.

"Fantastic hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

2. Overall not a horrible stay but not the best.

"Nice but not outstanding " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/26/2011 Vote

3. However, the Enterprise service was HORRIBLE.

"Great Value, Incredible Upgrade! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/6/2011 Vote

4. HOTEL CONFIRMED AND HAS BEEN HORRIBLE IN DEALING WITH ME.

Read full review 4/5/2011 Vote

5. ' The room I was given had horrible pet stains on the carpet which I have never experienced before in a pet friendly hotel room and the furnishings looked old and damaged.

"Not up to the ratings " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/5/2010 Vote

6. This was just the beginning of their horrible service.

"Big mistake " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/8/2009 Vote

7. On my second stay, I was on one of the lower floors (somewhere between 5-10) and it was HORRIBLE.

"Good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2009 Vote

8. The restaurant service staff was horrible.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 12/3/2008 Vote

9. Overall, my family`s reaction was that it wasn`t a horrible stay, but when we return to SF, we`ll definitely try somewhere else.

"A sad place. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/27/2007 Vote

10. The service was horrible.

"Bad News " Read full review on YahooTravel 8/1/2007 Vote