Whitehall Hotel Chicago, Chicago, Water Pressure

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Whitehall Hotel Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

75th

Out of 415

Whitehall Hotel Chicago	Average Price: $208 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

105 East Delaware Place

Chicago, 60611 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 31 of 39
Average review rating: 3.6

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (9) , Expedia (50) , MyTravelGuide (68) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (400) , YahooTravel (24)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (15) bar (44) bathroom (108) beach (12) bed (149) bill (10) breakfast (50) charge (16) check in (54) check out (11) closet (20) complimentary (11) concierge (36) cost (16) deal (30) decor (12) dinner (12) downtown (37) food (25) front desk (88) hotel (758) lake (15) lobby (79) location (314) manager (33) money (29) parking (25) pillow (28) price (91) rate (41) recommend (54) refund (10) restaurant (123) room (778) room service (24) service (132) sheets (14) shower (40) staff (242) street (82) suite (24) towel (19) tub (10) valet (22) valet parking (16) value (38) view (62) walk (52) water pressure (10) wireless (16)

Water pressure

Appears in 10 comments.

66% wrote positive comments about water pressure

The following words were used in comments with Water pressure:
bad (2) dirty (2) great (3) hotel (2) pressure (10)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The water pressure and temperature varied slightly but wasn't enough to annoy or scald.

"Afraid to be a first class hotel? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/2/2011 Vote

2. It is in a great location and has what you need, or at least what I look for in a hotel - it is quiet, the bed is very comfortable, heavy curtains make the room nice and dark for sleeping, the shower has great water pressure, and it was clean.

"everything you need, great location and great price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/29/2011 Vote

3. The water pressure is better than average in the shower.

"Very Nice! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2011 Vote

4. The best part about this hotel is their beds and showers ( the water pressure is great!).

"Wish we had known they were under construction " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/5/2009 Vote

5. shower head was okay but the water pressure was a trickle.

"overrated 4 star hotel, 3 star at best " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2012 Vote

6. Bed was good, so was water pressure.

"This is no four star Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/2/2009 Vote

7. Shower water pressure.

"Old, rundown hotel in great location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/18/2009 Vote

8. The water pressure in the shower is awful with variances in temperature throughout the entire 5 minute shower.

"Pretty Bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/6/2011 Vote

9. I read about complaints of musty smells, dirty sheets, dirty bathrooms, rude staff, bad elevators, bad water pressure; the list seemed endless.

"Delivered as promised, complaints debunked! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/23/2011 Vote

10. ) is that I have very thick hair and the shower water pressure was very poor - never was able to get all the shamp/cond out of my hair without using the faucet below in the shower on my hands and knees.

"A pure slice of HEAVEN! (+ in a great location!) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/2/2007 Vote