Whitehall Hotel Chicago, Chicago, Location

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Whitehall Hotel Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

75th

Out of 415

Whitehall Hotel Chicago	Average Price: $208 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

105 East Delaware Place

Chicago, 60611 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 31 of 39
Average review rating: 3.6

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (9) , Expedia (50) , MyTravelGuide (68) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (400) , YahooTravel (24)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (15) bar (44) bathroom (108) beach (12) bed (149) bill (10) breakfast (50) charge (16) check in (54) check out (11) closet (20) complimentary (11) concierge (36) cost (16) deal (30) decor (12) dinner (12) downtown (37) food (25) front desk (88) hotel (758) lake (15) lobby (79) location (314) manager (33) money (29) parking (25) pillow (28) price (91) rate (41) recommend (54) refund (10) restaurant (123) room (778) room service (24) service (132) sheets (14) shower (40) staff (242) street (82) suite (24) towel (19) tub (10) valet (22) valet parking (16) value (38) view (62) walk (52) water pressure (10) wireless (16)

Location

Appears in 309 comments.

95% wrote positive comments about location

The following words were used in comments with Location:
best (14) clean (21) comfortable (20) friendly (19) good (29) great (111) hotel (116) magnificent (18) nice (16) perfect (35) price (21)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. If you're not looking for a lot of 'bells & whistles' and a good, central location for a reasonable price then this is your hotel.

"Great location, but few amenities " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

2. Location is good but there are a so many other hotels in the area.

"Not the least bit luxurious... expect hidden FEES! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

3. Great location but in need of some nips and tucks.

"Great location, in need of a bit of a facelift " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

4. The location is basically unbeatable, if your interested in shopping at the Water Tower Place.

"Amazing location, but much to be desired. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/30/2012 Vote

5. The hotel worked well for us because we basically only slept there and location was amazing.

"Amazing location, but much to be desired. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/30/2012 Vote

6. Found the Whitehall fit into that budget and was in a perfect location.

"Great room for the price. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2012 Vote

7. For the price, you really can't find a better location if you're looking to stay downtown near Mag Mile.

"great location, exceptional value. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

8. If you're like me and want the most for their $$, a clean and very comfortable room in an unbeatable location with a great view (our room had an amazing view of the Hancock building), stay here.

"great location, exceptional value. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

9. It's in a good location.

"Decent. Solid. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

10. The location was outstanding, one block from The Hancock Building, less than one block from many bus routes, less than one block from The Magnificent Mile.

"5 star location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote