Allerton Hotel Chicago, Chicago, Broken

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Allerton Hotel Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

58th

Out of 415

Allerton Hotel Chicago	Average Price: $220 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

701 North Michigan Avenue

Chicago, 60611 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 20 of 73
Average review rating: 3.51

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (6) , Expedia (82) , MyTravelGuide (13) , Travelocity (31) , TripAdvisor (638) , YahooTravel (27)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (13) annoy (11) avoid (16) awful (8) awkward (8) bad (43) big deal (7) broken (8) complain (43) complaint (29) cramped (14) damage (6) dated (8) difficult (19) dirty (21) disappoint (54) downside (15) expensive (50) filthy (9) hard (28) hardly (11) hate (6) horrible (10) inconvenient (17) issue (52) lack (12) loud (17) mistake (8) mold (8) negative (35) noise (40) noisy (19) overbook (6) overpriced (9) peeling (7) poor (15) pricey (10) problem (72) ridiculous (10) rude (18) slow (53) smell (34) terrible (18) tiny (84) too small (16) uncomfortable (15) unfortunate (9) unpleasant (6) worst (20) wrong (15)

Broken

Appears in 11 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Broken:
desk (2) elevator (4) lighting (2) message (2) negative (2) room (2) shower (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. One hour later, shower still broken, the front desk called up and asked us if the issue had been resolved.

"Customer Service needs work... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/18/2011 Vote

2. On the really negative side, I reported our room safe broken on check-in and it stiil not fixed on check-out 3 days later which is a big fail on service.

"Good locations shame about the lifts " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/11/2011 Vote

3. Our remote to the tv was broken and it took 2 calls for them to come and fix it.

"Mixed review.... " Read full review on Travelocity 12/1/2008 Vote

4. Half of the elevators were broken, so people were cramming in them like cattle.

"Mixed review.... " Read full review on Travelocity 12/1/2008 Vote

5. The shade was broken.

"SOOO Small and Dark " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2008 Vote

6. Because the hotel is old the elevators are small and I believe that 3 of the elevators were broken.

"Great Location-Elevators an issue " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2008 Vote

7. Only 7 people max could fit in the elevators at one time and one of them was broken the whole time we were there.

"More like the `Allergy Hotel` " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2008 Vote

8. The phone was broken - the message waiting light was on and blinked all night long because we couldn`t acceess the message.

"Good location - bad hotel -- find another place to stay!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/4/2007 Vote

9. Our room had a desk light that had a broken outlet, a loose make-up mirror, and a shade that still worked fine but needed to have the bracket holding the rope that worked the shade to be reattached at the bottom.

"A Little bit of Europe " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/31/2005 Vote

10. expecting to check in, shower after 4 hours in a car with broken air conditioning, get dressed up and go to a show and dinner.

"Don`t believe you can check in at 3:00 p.m. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/10/2005 Vote