Kyoto Grand Hotel and Gardens, Los Angeles, Helpful

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Los Angeles Destinations » Los Angeles Hotels » Kyoto Grand Hotel and Gardens

OpinionWell
Rank

47th

Out of 700

Kyoto Grand Hotel and Gardens	Average Price: $189 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

120 South Los Angeles

Los Angeles, 90012 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 45
Average review rating: 3.31

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (50) , MyTravelGuide (104) , Travelocity (6) , TripAdvisor (390) , YahooTravel (16)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (9) adequate (9) attractive (14) awesome (12) beautiful (67) best (55) better (45) big (28) cares (14) cheaper (8) clean (142) comfortable (118) comfy (12) convenient (31) cool (11) correct (9) decent (11) delicious (10) efficient (18) excellent (34) exceptional (25) fabulous (9) fantastic (24) fast (8) free (74) friendly (124) good (174) gorgeous (9) great (238) happy (16) helpful (111) huge (19) liked (114) love (42) new (67) nice (231) perfect (19) perfectly (8) pleasant (25) plenty (10) positive (12) professional (10) quiet (25) reasonable (30) reasonably (9) responsive (8) spacious (22) terrific (12) welcoming (15) wonderful (41)

Helpful

Appears in 128 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Helpful:
$ (4) area (8) desk (13) downtown (5) efficient (4) extremely (6) friendly (44) garden (6) good (7) great (10) hotel (22) lobby (4) need (6) nice (11) not (9) pleasant (4) price (5) room (13) service (6) staff (81)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The young man working the bar was very friendly and helpful.

"Disappointing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

2. Following is the summary of my experience:Pros: comfortable beds, reasonably sized rooms, flat screen TV, friendly & helpful staff.

"Needs a renovation and a better kitchen... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

3. Good hotel, friendly and helpful staffPluses: relatively good situation downtown, shuttle service easily available.

"Good hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

4. The staff was very friendly and helpful.

"Decent Hotel About To Be Renovated " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

5. The staff were helpful with all our questions.

"One night stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

6. Only stayed one night so didn't get to explore all the hotel had to offer but the room was great and the Starbucks situated at the back of hotel was exceptionally helpful given our very early start the next day.

"One night stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

7. The staff was friendly and helpful.

"Great place! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2012 Vote

8. I was very irrate to ask for help with a simple request and be met with attitude I paid 170 only to take my simple request and walk to a near by establishment and resolve it myself.

"Simply disappointed. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/9/2012 Vote

9. They helped with giving me a different room.

"Kyoto has too much loud music at night " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/7/2012 Vote

10. But unless the Hilton company is prepared to invest in sound insulated walls and, particularly, windows, it won't help much.

"Highway quality at downtown prices " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/17/2012 Vote