InterContinental San Francisco, San Francisco, Accommodating

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » InterContinental San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

23rd

Out of 493

InterContinental San Francisco	Average Price: $277 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

888 Howard Street

San Francisco, 94103 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 15 of 37
Average review rating: 4.3

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (1) , Travelocity (5) , Expedia (32) , TripAdvisor (760)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (24) attentive (29) awesome (21) beautiful (78) best (117) better (114) big (96) cares (39) cheaper (20) clean (283) comfortable (227) comfy (30) convenient (72) courteous (26) decent (33) delicious (33) efficient (44) excellent (183) exceptional (47) fabulous (27) fantastic (71) free (150) fresh (34) friendly (238) generous (26) good (430) great (630) happy (29) helpful (244) huge (56) impressed (33) liked (218) love (101) luxurious (27) new (170) nice (462) outstanding (23) perfect (61) pleasant (44) plenty (31) positive (22) professional (40) quiet (72) reasonable (45) soft (21) spacious (86) spectacular (24) superb (22) welcoming (59) wonderful (75)

Accommodating

Appears in 29 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Accommodating:
clean (2) comfortable (2) desk (5) friendly (5) great (3) helpful (4) hotel (8) location (2) luxurious (2) nice (3) noise (2) not (4) room (8) service (3) staff (15)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Overall, I give 4 stars for its great value, location, above average (though not blow-me-out-of-the-water) service, and accommodation.

"Great property with a couple bumps " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/5/2012 Vote

2. but it was a very very fine accommodation, plus the fact that the room was huge.

"Great property with a couple bumps " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/5/2012 Vote

3. The hotel is very clean and the personnel were friendly and accommodating.

"Nice Hotel, Good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

4. The hotel staff was so friendly and accommodating to our families needs.

"Work Conference Turned Family Vacation " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/2/2012 Vote

5. Staff was very accommodating, giving us an upgrade on our room and the view we requested.

"Great service, clean rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/20/2012 Vote

6. With a happening bar in the lobby and very comfortable accommodations, it is a great hotel for business or pleasure.

"Better than average. I recommend! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/15/2012 Vote

7. This is a very nice hotel, great position within city, The staff was very nice and very accommodating.

"Love the Club Lounge! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/9/2012 Vote

8. The front desk was polite and very accommodating.

"Nice hotel experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/5/2012 Vote

9. The goal of the employees at the Intercontinental is delivering excellent customer service and superior accommodations.

"The Finest Hotel in San Francisco " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/1/2011 Vote

10. )It is expected that the staff is helpful, but it always stands out when even the bellmen and the valets are courteous and accommodating (which they are).

"Only SF hotel for me " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/28/2011 Vote