Hilton Chicago Hotel, Chicago, Attentive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Hilton Chicago Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

50th

Out of 415

Hilton Chicago Hotel	Average Price: $296 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

720 South Michigan Avenue

Chicago, 60605 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 23 of 39
Average review rating: 3.88

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (47) , MyTravelGuide (2407) , Travelocity (18) , TripAdvisor (815) , YahooTravel (73)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (19) adequate (18) attentive (22) awesome (22) beautiful (139) best (77) better (111) big (106) cares (36) cheaper (26) clean (232) comfortable (212) comfy (26) convenient (74) cool (35) courteous (17) decent (34) efficient (23) elegant (39) excellent (69) exceptional (31) fantastic (47) fast (34) free (137) fresh (20) friendly (195) fun (24) generous (22) good (370) great (482) happy (31) helpful (160) huge (85) liked (264) love (88) magnificent (69) new (61) nice (410) perfect (48) pleasant (48) plenty (54) positive (24) professional (21) quiet (51) reasonable (53) soft (18) spacious (60) tasteful (34) welcoming (29) wonderful (74)

Attentive

Appears in 56 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Attentive:
bar (4) bed (6) clean (4) desk (5) floor (4) food (6) friendly (13) great (6) helpful (4) hotel (18) huge (3) large (3) location (5) not (10) offers (5) personable (6) rating (4) room (10) service (9) staff (34)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. And service from staff was generally and surprisingly attentive and responsive.

"Mega-hotel, with all that implies " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

2. The staff is friendly and highly attentive.

"Big Hotel, Boutique Feel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/22/2012 Vote

3. Other than that, the food was good, and the wait staff was very attentive and friendly.

"I had a great stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/17/2011 Vote

4. With a little more attention to the food, I think it could be a really great place, as it is, it's nothing memorable.

"Magnificent & Comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/1/2011 Vote

5. Wait staff was exceptionally attentive and friendly.

"Good Value and Staff Integrity " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/25/2011 Vote

6. The room itself was well presented, a little more attention could have been paid to the cleaning and dusting, it was fairly small with 2 beds but we liked the luxury of a bathroom each.

"A well sited hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/21/2011 Vote

7. Housekeeping and Management must not be concerned with attention to detail at this hotel.

"Outdated and Disappointing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/30/2011 Vote

8. Heating/air conditioning: this made a great deal of noise but never worked, in spite of the attentions of the hotel's technician.

"Dirty & Depressing! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/10/2011 Vote

9. Promptly brought it to the attention of Customer Service, who after much discussion, informed me they could only offer me another room on their smoking floor which was all they had available.

"Good location - Smokey Rooms & Below Average Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/18/2011 Vote

10. The beds are so comfortable and the staff attentive.

"I love, love this hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/28/2011 Vote