Residence Inn by Marriott Times Square New York, New York City, Adequate

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Residence Inn by Marriott Times Square New York

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

87th

Out of 676

Residence Inn by Marriott Times Square New York	Average Price: $397 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1033 Avenue of the Americas

New York City, 10018 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 27 of 154
Average review rating: 4.51

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (1) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (713) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (16) adequate (25) awesome (25) beautiful (24) best (113) better (80) big (65) cares (18) clean (305) comfortable (248) comfy (42) convenient (92) courteous (23) decent (33) efficient (27) excellent (141) exceptional (31) fabulous (20) fantastic (70) fast (23) free (190) fresh (41) friendly (234) fun (16) generous (21) good (394) great (598) happy (26) helpful (236) huge (47) impressed (26) liked (122) love (50) new (214) nice (312) outstanding (16) perfect (114) perfectly (17) pleasant (45) pleased (17) plenty (83) positive (21) professional (21) quiet (84) reasonable (33) soft (14) spacious (93) spotless (20) welcoming (28) wonderful (97)

Adequate

Appears in 29 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Adequate:
area (3) bathroom (3) breakfast (12) clean (3) comfortable (3) expectation (3) food (3) great (3) hot (3) kitchen (3) need (3) not (4) plenty (2) residence (2) room (13) size (2) small (2) smaller (2) standard (3) view (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The bar remains open later and the fare is somewhat limited, but certainly adequate for a meal.

"Excellent location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2012 Vote

2. Breakfast was perfectly adequate and always plenty of hot and cold choices (no bacon mind).

"Thanks you Trip advisor reviewers " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/23/2011 Vote

3. The staff is friendly, courteous and helpful, the rooms are spacious (ours had a great view), and the breakfast is more than adequate, including complimentary copies of the New York Times.

"Great choice for the Big Apple " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/21/2011 Vote

4. Rooms are adequate and reasonably clean.

"Times Square Marriott " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/11/2011 Vote

5. The room was small by Residence Inn standards but more than adequate by NYC standards.

"Totally Satisfied " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2011 Vote

6. My room was not large, but was adequate for a king bed and a sofabed.

"Excellent New York location for tourists " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/23/2011 Vote

7. It was more than adequate.

"Enjoyed our stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/11/2011 Vote

8. The bathroom was cramped but adequate with a shower/tub combination and equipped with a hairdryer and drawers for toiletries.

"Good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/6/2011 Vote

9. Bathroom was adequate.

"Nice basic hotel, excellent service, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/5/2011 Vote

10. The room itself was adequate however not as I had exected it to be - as it was described as two seperate areas - one for sleeping and one for relaxing - sofa, TV, kitchen.

"Location is great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/2/2011 Vote