Marriott New Orleans, New Orleans, Inconvenient

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Louisiana » New Orleans Destinations » New Orleans Hotels » Marriott New Orleans

OpinionWell
Rank

31st

Out of 427

Marriott New Orleans	Average Price: $241 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

555 Canal Street

New Orleans, 70130 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 13 of 37
Average review rating: 3.82

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (71) , BedBugRegistry (11) , MyTravelGuide (868) , TripAdvisor (750) , Travelocity (5) , YahooTravel (18)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (13) annoy (18) avoid (10) awful (5) bad (67) bed bugs (8) broken (7) complain (35) complaint (24) cramped (16) crappy (6) damage (5) dated (14) difficult (11) dirty (16) disappoint (42) downside (6) expensive (45) hard (29) hassle (8) horrible (13) inconvenient (11) issue (41) lack (16) loud (22) mess (9) mold (12) negative (19) noise (54) noisy (22) outdated (7) outrageous (8) overbook (10) overpriced (14) poor (16) pretty small (5) pricey (21) problem (94) ridiculous (14) rude (24) shock (5) slow (41) smell (49) terrible (19) tiny (23) uncomfortable (5) unfortunate (10) worn (10) worst (17) wrong (20)

Inconvenient

Appears in 20 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Inconvenient:
apology (3) bags (2) charged (2) desk (2) expense (2) hotel (4) not (2) park (7) room (5) safe (2) valet (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. I was moved to a different room (again, without any apology for my inconvenience).

"Can't believe this place bears the Marriott name! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2012 Vote

2. They say it's very modern and efficient but we waiting FOREVER for elevators every single time, it was so inconvenient.

"Beautiful hotel, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

3. I was worried that being on the edge of the quarter would be inconvenient, but it was truly a perfect location.

"Perfect location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/8/2012 Vote

4. Slight inconvenience going from one tower to the other to get to it.

"A busy hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/20/2012 Vote

5. We found this inconvenient and we ended up storing valuables in our bags and locking up our bags instead.

"French Quarter Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2012 Vote

6. Big inconvenience.

"My husband booked the stay :-( " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2012 Vote

7. ), however, it was more of an inconvenience to have to wait for our vehicle to be pulled around every time we needed something simple out of it such as a bottle of water (seems how you will be charged $4 per each bottle you drink in the room).

"Will NEVER stay at another Marriott! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/22/2011 Vote

8. This hotel uses the excuse that they are a full service convention hotel as their reasoning for all of the extra charges and the inconvenience.

"Hotel With Mjor Attitude Problem " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/13/2010 Vote

9. Sadly, better than half the staff members we encountered were less than helpful or treated us as an inconvenience.

"Great location - some of staff needs better training " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/25/2009 Vote

10. We dislike valet parking due to the inconvenience (little access to car, wait time, etc.

"Mixed Opinion " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/26/2008 Vote