Westin Chicago, Chicago, Worn

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Westin Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

30th

Out of 415

Westin Chicago	Average Price: $324 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

320 North Dearborn Avenue

Chicago, 60610 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 13 of 39
Average review rating: 4.22

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (641) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (550) , YahooTravel (45)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit high (3) annoy (6) avoid (4) bad (18) badly (2) big deal (5) broken (5) complain (9) complaint (17) difficult (13) dirty (3) disappoint (32) downside (8) expensive (38) frustrated (4) hard (17) hassle (3) horrible (3) inconvenient (4) irritate (3) issue (21) lack (6) loud (5) mess (3) negative (13) noise (25) noisy (6) outdated (4) outrageous (2) overbook (5) overcharged (2) overpriced (2) poor (10) poorly (3) pricey (12) problem (31) ridiculous (7) rock (4) rude (7) shock (3) slow (11) smell (10) stain (2) tear (2) terrible (13) unfortunate (7) unfriendly (2) worn (4) worst (6) wrong (6)

Worn	Appears in 5 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Worn:
bed (2) not (2) room (2) worst (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The rooms are getting a little worn, I would love to see a large scale renovation to the hotel itself (which is why I'm not rating the property with 5 'stars').

"Staff are amazing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/20/2012 Vote

2. The worst part was the bed was quite worn out.

"Great location but not a great bed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/7/2010 Vote

3. The worst part was the bed was quite worn out.

"Great location but not a great bed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/7/2010 Vote

4. Time has worn away at the facility that once was so stellar.

"Oh, what it used to be! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/15/2010 Vote

5. Room was clean, though, and not worn in any way.

"While Not Flawless, Had a Very Nice Time " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2005 Vote