Fairmont San Francisco, San Francisco, Staff

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Fairmont San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

8th

Out of 493

Fairmont San Francisco	Average Price: $290 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

950 Mason Street

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 37
Average review rating: 4.19

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (77) , MyTravelGuide (2) , Travelocity (10) , TripAdvisor (885) , YahooTravel (39)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (34) balcony (42) bar (127) bath (34) bathroom (208) beach (23) bed (199) bill (24) breakfast (191) charge (57) check in (107) check out (34) closet (53) complimentary (37) concierge (115) cost (58) deal (69) decor (36) dinner (56) downtown (29) fee (23) food (170) front desk (121) gym (52) hotel (1664) housekeeping (55) lobby (280) location (369) manager (36) money (59) parking (97) pillow (26) pool (30) price (116) rate (72) recommend (104) restaurant (204) room (1592) room service (89) service (364) shower (85) staff (384) street (98) suite (144) towel (31) tub (22) valet (24) view (489) walk (178) wireless (46)

Staff

Appears in 383 comments.

93% wrote positive comments about staff

The following words were used in comments with Staff:
attentive (17) bar (15) beauty (20) car (14) concierge (26) courteous (15) desk (37) friendly (93) good (24) great (54) helpful (100) hotel (103) housekeeping (14) location (22) nice (26) professional (15)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Not only was the room amazing the staff was incredible too, they set everything up for me and my boyfriend to see some tourist sites while we were in town.

"Best trip ever! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

2. Amazing staff.

"Wow the luxury! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

3. The place is huge, but all the staff I encountered were very generous with their smiles.

"Iconic, stunning views, but quite a trek on foot " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2012 Vote

4. Staff here were very friendly and helpful.

"Top of the city " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

5. The staff was friendly and helpful.

"Beautiful surroundings and great service. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

6. The staff at reception were helpful and courteous but although the concierge were helpful they recommended a very poor restaurant in china town which spoiled one of our evenings which was very disappointing as we were only there for 4 nights.

"Beautiful hotel, pity about the staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

7. It's not chic, it's not contemporary but it's really charming and staff are good.

"Its a classic, with some quirks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

8. We found the staff at the bell desk to be friendly and helpful.

"First Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

9. We found the concierge and bell staff to be really charming and helpful.

"Loses a point because of NOISE " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2012 Vote

10. The staff was also very helpful and friendly -- the concierge helped me make some limousine/car service arrangements without a hitch -- the service that they use was very professional.

"Very Good Short Stay at a Legend " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/18/2012 Vote