Hotel Monaco San Francisco, San Francisco, Excellent

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Hotel Monaco San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

5th

Out of 493

Hotel Monaco San Francisco	Average Price: $294 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

501 Geary Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 37
Average review rating: 4.42

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (53) , MyTravelGuide (301) , Travelocity (11) , TripAdvisor (697) , YahooTravel (20)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (34) attentive (24) beautiful (78) best (61) better (44) big (62) cares (24) clean (179) comfortable (182) comfy (21) convenient (33) cozy (34) decent (19) delicious (17) efficient (30) enjoyable (19) excellent (115) exceptional (28) fabulous (30) fantastic (36) free (171) friendly (258) fun (44) funky (20) generous (17) good (245) gorgeous (17) great (458) happy (64) helpful (223) huge (33) liked (150) love (121) new (25) nice (294) outstanding (17) perfect (72) pleasant (35) pleased (19) plenty (23) positive (16) professional (17) quiet (63) reasonable (18) spacious (31) stylish (24) tasteful (42) terrific (17) welcoming (49) wonderful (100)

Excellent

Appears in 215 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Excellent:
bar (14) cafe (12) clean (10) comfortable (9) decorate (10) food (22) free (9) friendly (17) good (17) great (21) helpful (9) hotel (57) location (43) night (10) not (10) room (40) service (51) staff (46) well (11) wine (18)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. the bathroom was also very good, but also the reason that I could not give this property an excellent rating.

""Great hotel, fantastic staff." " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

2. The service was excellent with friendly and attentive staff.

"Great location, great service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/18/2012 Vote

3. I am rating this property Average not because we had some negative experiences, but because our stay in Hotel Monaco Seattle was excellent in comparison.

"Pleasant stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/18/2012 Vote

4. I had dinner one night at the restaurant and it was excellent.

"Not a great value for the $ " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

5. I always enjoy a Kimpton Hotel-- well run, excellent service.

"Great Union Square Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2012 Vote

6. The staff was excellent in everything from restaurant reccomendations to car rental information.

"One of my favorite Hotels EVER " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

7. Very nice hotel--excellent service.

"great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

8. We had an excellent stay at the Monaco and I would stay there again.

"Everything was great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/12/2012 Vote

9. The staff at the Monaco was excellent and always willing to help -- whether it was a change of room because we were initially booked directly in front of the business center or with various recommendations for breakfast or with the fastest directions.

"Wonderful Service at Boutique Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/6/2012 Vote

10. All the essentials are provided - excellent bed and linens, good shower and bathroom, gym, and privacy.

"Euro-zip " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2012 Vote