Sheraton San Diego, San Diego, Horrible

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Diego Destinations » San Diego Hotels » Sheraton San Diego

OpinionWell
Rank

14th

Out of 517

Sheraton San Diego	Average Price: $231 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1380 Harbor Island Drive

San Diego, 92101 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 7 of 30
Average review rating: 3.48

OpinionWell Value Index: 7

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (79) , MyTravelGuide (1112) , Travelocity (11) , TripAdvisor (792) , YahooTravel (48)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (22) avoid (12) awful (8) bad (92) broken (12) complain (37) complaint (29) difficult (10) dirt (24) dirty (32) disappoint (63) disgust (10) disturbing (9) downside (12) expensive (87) frustrated (12) gross (8) hard (25) horrible (16) inconvenient (16) issue (73) lack (20) loud (40) miserable (9) mistake (9) mold (14) negative (39) noise (166) noisy (21) outrageous (15) overpriced (31) peeling (10) poor (27) poorly (8) pricey (25) problem (89) ridiculous (18) rock (15) rude (19) shock (8) slow (39) smell (30) terrible (24) tiny (8) ugly (8) unacceptable (8) unfortunate (17) worn (12) worst (16) wrong (24)

Horrible

Appears in 29 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Horrible:
bath (2) bathroom (2) customer (3) desk (2) experience (4) friendly (2) hotel (5) lighting (2) location (3) not (10) old (2) park (8) poor (3) quality (2) room (12) rough (2) service (5) sheets (2) staff (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Not too fond of the stark white tile, but it wasn't horrible.

"A great stay at the Sheraton! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/4/2012 Vote

2. However, the chicken tenders tasted like cardboard, it was horrible.

"NO HOT WATER, INTERNET BROKEN, WACKY A/C " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/21/2011 Vote

3. we ended up having to park on the other side furthest from our room, and while the walk was not too horrible, it was not short either, and add to that being exhausted, and having to park in a crappy place after paying a fairly high amount for parking ($22 PER night), i was NOT happy.

"Ok, but not worth the price, and certainly not for leisure travelers " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/17/2011 Vote

4. The service at this hotel was horrible.

"Nice Views, Poor Service - Bay Tower " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/2/2011 Vote

5. Air conditioning unit sounds horrible with water sloshing around inside of it.

"No service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote

6. Oh my God, the following day our HORRIBLE customer experience continiued.

"Read "TERRIBLE" and "POOR" Tripod reviews BEFORE you book it! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/29/2011 Vote

7. This was a horrible experience as we have just landed after a very long flight.

"Read "TERRIBLE" and "POOR" Tripod reviews BEFORE you book it! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/29/2011 Vote

8. horrible experience.

"Read "TERRIBLE" and "POOR" Tripod reviews BEFORE you book it! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/29/2011 Vote

9. I was offered one day free parking because of above horrible experience.

"Sheraton's name and motel 6 quality " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2011 Vote

10. they are not horrible but not places I would want to eat every meal for five days.

"this hotel was horrible " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/2/2010 Vote