JW Marriott Hotel Washington DC, Washington DC, Wrong

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » JW Marriott Hotel Washington DC

OpinionWell
Rank

28th

Out of 279

JW Marriott Hotel Washington DC	Average Price: $497 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20004 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 30
Average review rating: 4.59

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (35) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (612) , YahooTravel (81)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (8) a bit small (10) annoy (14) avoid (10) bad (21) barely (6) bed bugs (6) complain (21) complaint (21) cramped (6) dated (8) difficult (7) dirty (4) disappoint (45) downside (13) expensive (61) frustrated (5) hard (17) hassle (7) horrible (5) ignored (6) inconvenient (5) incorrect (4) issue (32) lack (9) loud (11) mistake (8) negative (18) noise (28) noisy (10) overpriced (7) poor (4) poorly (6) pretty small (4) pricey (24) problem (48) ridiculous (6) rude (22) sad (4) slow (18) terrible (4) tiny (10) too small (5) ugly (6) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (13) unfriendly (4) weird (4) worst (12) wrong (7)

Wrong

Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Wrong:
elevator (4) floor (3) hotel (3) location (2) metro (2) not (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Overall, if you've got the coin and location is paramount to you, it's hard to go wrong with this property.

"Wonderful Property but not w/o Drawbacks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/11/2012 Vote

2. If you change your mind or realize you've pressed the wrong buttons, there are no buttons inside the elevator itself.

"Overcrowded Concierge Lounge " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/5/2012 Vote

3. But - oops - what if the rider pressed the wrong floor when calling for the elevator to begin with? He wants to go to' five', but he pressed 'four'.

"A stupid solution in seach of a problem... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/20/2012 Vote

4. We got the wrong bags not once but twice.

"Excellent hotel in almost every way!!!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/11/2009 Vote

5. Not my favorite hotel in DC, but nothing wrong with it.

"Typical Mariott " Read full review on Expedia 8/26/2009 Vote

6. Downside, if you are looking for nightlife you are in the wrong area and will need to head somewhere else on the metro.

"Location, location, location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/10/2009 Vote

7. Once you are on the elevator though, should you decide to go to a different floor or if you accidentally got on the wrong elevator, you'll have to get off at whatever floor it drops you off at and try again.

"Your Average Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/2/2009 Vote

8. They were the ones who gave me directions when my MapQuest were wrong.

"JW is a Great Place " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/27/2006 Vote

9. There was a mishap with our luggage the first night (delivered to the wrong room but finally located the next day) but after that we had a wonderful stay.

"Enjoyable Stay for a Couple from Arroyo Grande, CA " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/27/2006 Vote

10. We asked about local restuarants and they were very unhelpful, actually giving us wrong directions.

"Fantastic Location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/25/2005 Vote