Sir Francis Drake Hotel San Francisco, San Francisco, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Sir Francis Drake Hotel San Francisco

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

58th

Out of 493

Sir Francis Drake Hotel San Francisco	Average Price: $252 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

450 Powell Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 22 of 110
Average review rating: 3.5

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (5) , Expedia (54) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (721) , YahooTravel (28)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (8) annoy (13) avoid (8) awful (19) bad (45) badly (7) broken (15) chipped (15) complain (28) complaint (13) cramped (11) dated (17) delay (10) difficult (8) dirty (27) disappoint (49) disgust (9) disturbing (8) downside (7) expensive (30) filthy (15) hard (31) hate (9) horrible (12) issue (42) lack (13) loud (27) mold (8) negative (20) noise (112) noisy (43) overpriced (9) peeling (17) poor (25) pricey (7) problem (65) rude (13) sad (7) shabby (11) slow (16) smell (25) terrible (16) tiny (75) too small (9) uncomfortable (8) unfortunate (22) unfriendly (9) worn (20) worst (18) wrong (12)

Bad	Appears in 72 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
area (3) bar (5) bathroom (9) few (6) good (5) hotel (21) liked (4) location (6) need (6) night (3) not (11) old (8) pretty (4) reviews (5) room (19) service (3) small (6) staff (4) view (3) walking (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My first bad taste was an email to the concierge.

"Kimpton never let me down so BAD!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/9/2012 Vote

2. Now the bad.

"5 Star Service but a 3 Star Property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

3. My BAD for insisting we stay half a block to Union Square, and trying to keep within a certain budget (279- 299 dollars per night) to stay at the Sir Francis Drake.

"DISAPPOINTING!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

4. (but that i guess was just bad luck, as the other room was fine) However the hotel staff is friendly and the location is excellent.

"Average hotel but very good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/7/2012 Vote

5. Simply put, the hallways smelled pretty bad, and the hotel's non-smoking policy didn't seem to preclude a few loud drug-fueled parties.

"Comfortable but for the strong smell of drugs " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/9/2011 Vote

6. I wore my shower shoes, its that bad.

"Horrible " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2011 Vote

7. Bathroom was tiny and the tub overlay was badly chipped.

"Good service, comfy bed, clean room, SF charm, old quirky hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/16/2011 Vote

8. One thing that was bad about the mezzanine bar was a visit one night from Jim, a local transvestite that frequents the bar for some reason.

"Nice location and decent hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/11/2011 Vote

9. The setting actually wasn't bad, and we stopped in a couple of evenings while we were there.

"Nice location and decent hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/11/2011 Vote

10. I feel bad for them that they're stuck in this place.

"Dark, depressing, desperately needs a renovation " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/5/2011 Vote