Homewood Suites Chicago, Chicago, Inconvenient

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Homewood Suites Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

8th

Out of 415

Homewood Suites Chicago	Average Price: $245 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

40 East Grand Avenue

Chicago, 60611 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 73
Average review rating: 4.41

OpinionWell Value Index: 8

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (10) , MyTravelGuide (104) , Travelocity (10) , Expedia (46) , TripAdvisor (860)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (5) annoy (10) avoid (12) awful (4) bad (43) big deal (10) bit dated (5) broken (5) chipped (8) complain (12) complaint (32) cramped (6) dated (21) difficult (8) dirty (11) disappoint (27) disturbing (6) downfall (5) downside (15) expensive (40) fussy (5) hard (36) hardly (5) hassle (7) horrible (4) inconvenient (14) issue (40) lack (5) loud (5) negative (24) nightmare (4) noise (38) noisy (10) outdated (7) overpriced (5) poor (12) pricey (7) problem (62) rock (16) rude (5) slow (35) smell (20) terrible (6) tiny (7) uncomfortable (12) unfortunate (5) weird (4) worn (18) would have liked (8) wrong (17)

Inconvenient

Appears in 16 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Inconvenient:
bathroom (3) big (2) elevator (2) hotel (4) liked (2) not (2) problem (2) room (2) sink (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. There were a sizeable number of family groups staying at the hotel which might explain some of the elevator inconvenience for our stay.

"Great Location, great room but a few technical flaws " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/8/2012 Vote

2. However, these minor inconveniences were outnumbered by all the good things about this hotel.

"Very nice hotel for reasonable price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/5/2012 Vote

3. There are some minor inconveniences we've encountered while here that I should note.

"A Great Place to Rest " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2012 Vote

4. They made an error and never owned up to it, nor did they do anything to compensate us for such a huge inconvenience.

"How the Hilton stole Christmas... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/20/2011 Vote

5. Not really a problem with a 1 year old but pretty inconvenient if you have a smaller baby that fell asleep in the stroller.

"Family friendly " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/14/2011 Vote

6. The only 'big' inconvenience we had was that the closest L line station (Red line) was under construction so there was no elevator and the only way to take the stroller with us was to take very long stairs.

"Family friendly " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/14/2011 Vote

7. The bathroom is big but the sink is outside of the bathroom in the bedroom which is kind of inconvenient if someone is still sleeoing and you wanted to use the sink and mirror.

"Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/2/2011 Vote

8. Temperature control in the room was imprecise - minor inconvenience but without clean blankets on our only night, it made for a cold stay.

"Woefully inadequate " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/28/2011 Vote

9. Minor inconvenience with the free wifi internet.

"Great Hotel, Great Service, Mediocre Bed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2011 Vote

10. inconvenient, but not a real problem.

"A Great Oasis in the Concrete Jungle " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2011 Vote