Residence Inn by Marriott Times Square New York, New York City, Shower

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Residence Inn by Marriott Times Square New York

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

87th

Out of 676

Residence Inn by Marriott Times Square New York	Average Price: $397 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1033 Avenue of the Americas

New York City, 10018 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 27 of 154
Average review rating: 4.51

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (1) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (713) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (17) bar (82) bargain (10) bath (21) bathroom (138) bed (300) breakfast (683) charge (14) check in (91) check out (40) checkout (16) closet (21) complimentary (71) concierge (61) cost (29) deal (24) dinner (47) food (131) front desk (111) gym (14) hotel (1088) housekeeping (38) laundry (21) lobby (50) location (514) lunch (15) manager (26) money (50) parking (25) pillow (42) price (120) rate (78) recommend (114) restaurant (76) room (1273) room service (10) service (166) sheets (12) shower (43) staff (420) street (119) suite (93) towel (37) tub (11) valet (12) valet parking (11) value (61) view (250) walk (208) wireless (39)

Shower

Appears in 42 comments.

75% wrote positive comments about shower

The following words were used in comments with Shower:
clean (3) excellent (4) great (5) hot (5) hotel (5) lotion (3) nice (3) night (3) plenty (5)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The water-saver shower-head was less than wonderful but water-efficient I guess.

"Very Central, very comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/17/2011 Vote

2. I had no problem with the bathroom or shower and I am 5'10' tall.

"Enjoyed our stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/11/2011 Vote

3. making the shower seem quite large.

"A Perfect Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/19/2010 Vote

4. The bathroom was small but the shower had excellent power and there was always plenty of hot water.

"Excellent hotel, top location, great service!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/3/2009 Vote

5. Check in and check out were perfect, the beds were soft and comfy, the kitchens had everything we could ever want, and the showers were heavenly.

"Wonderful accommodations, unbelievable service! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/29/2009 Vote

6. The rooms are very nice and have a great shower and plenty of space to do work.

"Close to Penn Station and Great staff and rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/13/2009 Vote

7. The rooms are spacious with great views and a huge lovely shower.

"This Hotel is Ideal for Everybody " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/9/2009 Vote

8. We had taken showers and the shower heads were great as well as the water pressure.

"Clean & comfy bed with some minor annoyances... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/27/2009 Vote

9. The bathroom may not be huge, but the shower had excellent water pressure and plenty of hot water, and the vanity had a drawer and cupboard for storage.

"Great stay at the Residence Inn " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2008 Vote

10. was big and flat and the shower was the best after a long day nice water pressure and good temperature the bathroom is big too.

"This is the place to be !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2008 Vote