Holiday Inn Express San Francisco, San Francisco, Parking

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Holiday Inn Express San Francisco

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

38th

Out of 493

Holiday Inn Express San Francisco	Average Price: $211 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

550 North Point Street

San Francisco, 94133 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 110
Average review rating: 4.11

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (80) , MyTravelGuide (180) , Travelocity (19) , TripAdvisor (755) , YahooTravel (21)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (19) bar (36) bathroom (72) beach (21) bed (81) bill (9) breakfast (622) cable (16) charge (22) check in (66) check out (22) complimentary (45) concierge (9) cost (55) deal (26) decor (15) dinner (15) downtown (20) fee (25) food (111) front desk (109) hotel (1134) housekeeping (21) laundry (17) lobby (96) location (514) manager (9) money (46) parking (168) pillow (10) pool (33) price (98) rate (37) recommend (123) restaurant (109) room (901) service (103) shower (24) shuttle (26) staff (338) street (141) suite (59) to park (24) towel (22) valet (20) valet parking (24) value (55) view (105) walk (241) wireless (53)

Parking

Appears in 163 comments.

35% wrote positive comments about parking

The following words were used in comments with Parking:
free (11) garage (10) hotel (53) need (8) nice (11) night (35)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The fact that I have to pay $45 for overnight parking is outrageous.

"Okay... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

2. complimentary breakfast was goodcons-- room showing wear, expensive parking.

"everything you need " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

3. One downside - if you have a car the parking is extortionate ($45 a day .

"Brilliant Hotel ! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/15/2012 Vote

4. At first the only to negative issues we had with this hotel:rooms are pretty expensive (therefore I used priority points) and valet parking is also pretty pricey (better park your car by yourself at one of the nearby parking lots - it'll save you a couple bucks).

"great location and friendly staff - but pricey " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2012 Vote

5. While researching hotels in the area, we found comparable hotel rooms for a little less money, however they charged $40-50/day for parking and did not include a free breakfast.

"Basic, clean & good location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2012 Vote

6. My only complaint would be the $45 parking fee.

"Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/5/2012 Vote

7. The parking is 45 plus tax, expensive, but they let you know, so I planned for it and it's fine.

"Needs a good cleaning " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/11/2011 Vote

8. Nothing fancy but very clean, had a parking garage and we didn't need the car for anything anyway.

"We would stay again..... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/20/2011 Vote

9. I'd only make a remark about parking prices that I think are WAY too expensive, but I guess this is kind of a normal behavior in SF.

"Pleasant stay !! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/15/2011 Vote

10. My only complaint would be the outrageous parking fees which with taxes came to around $50 a day.

"Enjoyable stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote