Renaissance New York Hotel Times Square, New York City, Noise

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Renaissance New York Hotel Times Square

OpinionWell
Rank

28th

Out of 676

Renaissance New York Hotel Times Square	Average Price: $467 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

Two Times Square, 714 7th Avenue

New York City, 10036 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 12 of 106
Average review rating: 4.34

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (28) , MyTravelGuide (49) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (673) , YahooTravel (50)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (22) bar (165) bath (22) bathroom (180) bathtub (11) bed (128) bill (14) breakfast (129) charge (26) check in (113) check out (17) checkout (11) closet (13) complimentary (15) concierge (132) cost (26) decor (47) dinner (35) discount (14) downtown (13) food (91) front desk (47) hotel (1263) housekeeping (20) lobby (199) location (467) lunch (13) manager (13) mini bar (10) money (26) parking (12) pillow (26) price (73) rate (36) recommend (106) restaurant (180) room (1043) room service (21) service (173) shower (106) staff (333) street (137) suite (22) towel (31) tub (25) value (24) view (303) walk (95) walk in (16) wireless (25)

Noise

Appears in 155 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noise:
better (9) busy (9) floor (46) great (8) hallway (11) high (10) hotel (27) location (14) loud (8) night (20) not (31) problem (9) quiet (11) room (51) sirens (8) sleep (9) sound (8) street (49) traffic (11) view (10)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. We did not have any issues with noise.

"Great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

2. Everytime the lift doors opened the noise felt like it was inside of your room.

"Great Location - Rooms too Noisy " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/20/2012 Vote

3. We were on a higher floor, so other than the sound of police sirens afar, noise was not an issue.

"A solid choice in Times Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2012 Vote

4. high enough to blot out abit of traffic noise but a great view up and down 7th ave with amazing lights at night.

"Perfect Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

5. My room on the 25th floor was quite, no noise from inside or out.

"My new default hotel in Midtown " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

6. Overall a great place to stay in what is a busy and loud city, we stayed on the 19th floor and did not hear any noise.

"Great place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/9/2012 Vote

7. There was no noise from the streets below, the rooms were a good size and we'd definitely come and stay here again.

"Fantastic hotel in a superb location ! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/6/2012 Vote

8. We were up high and had no issues with Times Square noise.

"Great Location, Great Rooms, Best Bar View ever! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/17/2012 Vote

9. We were on the 5th floor, and the noise from the street wasn't a problem.

"comfortable hotel in great location for theater goers " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/11/2012 Vote

10. While the location is in a very busy corridor, once inside the property you can escape the street noise and hustle in a relatively low-key lobby.

"Great value, quiet, comfortable, convenient " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/2/2012 Vote