Renaissance New York Hotel Times Square, New York City, Bath

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Renaissance New York Hotel Times Square

OpinionWell
Rank

28th

Out of 676

Renaissance New York Hotel Times Square	Average Price: $467 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

Two Times Square, 714 7th Avenue

New York City, 10036 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 12 of 106
Average review rating: 4.34

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (28) , MyTravelGuide (49) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (673) , YahooTravel (50)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (22) bar (165) bath (22) bathroom (180) bathtub (11) bed (128) bill (14) breakfast (129) charge (26) check in (113) check out (17) checkout (11) closet (13) complimentary (15) concierge (132) cost (26) decor (47) dinner (35) discount (14) downtown (13) food (91) front desk (47) hotel (1263) housekeeping (20) lobby (199) location (467) lunch (13) manager (13) mini bar (10) money (26) parking (12) pillow (26) price (73) rate (36) recommend (106) restaurant (180) room (1043) room service (21) service (173) shower (106) staff (333) street (137) suite (22) towel (31) tub (25) value (24) view (303) walk (95) walk in (16) wireless (25)

Bath	Appears in 22 comments. 100% wrote positive comments about bath

The following words were used in comments with Bath:
big (2) clean (5) double (4) good (2) great (7) liked (4) location (2) new (2) nice (4) spacious (3) tub (2) walking (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Really good sized bathroom also with equally good shower and bath.

"Excellent Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/4/2012 Vote

2. Our room was big enough for the two double beds and the bathroom had a deep bath (which is great for some of us Brits who do not particularly like showers).

"Xmas 2011 " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/4/2012 Vote

3. The bedroom was spacious and clean, we had a great bath for relaxing in after walking around all day.

"The perfect hotel-spot on location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/28/2011 Vote

4. Our rooms were beautifully appointed and spotlessly clean, our beds were like sleeping a cloud and the best bath I have ever had.

"Great hotel - best location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/20/2011 Vote

5. Nice also to see a bath shower combo as depending on time both got used.

"Great hotel in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2011 Vote

6. Plenty of bath products are provided.

"Great Staff, Great Hotel, Great Room, and Great Location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/21/2010 Vote

7. The room was clean, great bath/shower (with complementary Aveda brand products), awesome lobby/lounge, and centrally located.

"Great Location, Price, & Room! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2010 Vote

8. baths in room and ammenities were acceptable bed was easy to sleep in and bath was big but service was not top notch for the scale of hotel we had reserved.

"could have been better for the money " Read full review on Expedia 9/18/2008 Vote

9. Comfy beds, nice bathroom with great water pressure and Aveda bath products.

"Location, location, location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/22/2012 Vote

10. Our room with a king bed only had a shower, not a bath so that was disappointing to my wife.

"Hard to find " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/13/2011 Vote