Hotel Monaco Denver - a Kimpton Hotel, Denver, Unfortunate

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Colorado » Denver Destinations » Denver Hotels » Hotel Monaco Denver - a Kimpton Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

10th

Out of 289

Hotel Monaco Denver - a Kimpton Hotel	Average Price: $295 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1717 Champa Street at 17th

Denver, 80202 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 16
Average review rating: 4.24

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (68) , MyTravelGuide (68) , Travelocity (15) , TripAdvisor (373) , YahooTravel (39)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (6) annoy (2) avoid (6) awful (3) bad (15) barely (4) bed bugs (11) chipped (5) complain (5) complaint (17) confront (4) cram (2) cramped (4) damage (2) delay (3) difficult (5) dirty (3) disappoint (31) disturbing (3) downside (5) expensive (25) frustrated (4) hard (12) hate (4) inconvenient (5) issue (12) lack (12) loud (12) mediocre (4) negative (12) noise (23) noisy (3) odor (5) overpriced (5) poorly (4) pricey (7) problem (30) ridiculous (6) rock (3) rude (5) sad (3) slow (8) smell (12) tiny (4) uncomfortable (6) unfortunate (10) weird (3) worst (5) would have liked (4) wrong (10)

Unfortunate

Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Unfortunate:
hotel (3) liked (2) night (2) not (4) room (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. We will not be staying at a Kimpton again, unfortunately.

"Felt cheap, overpriced " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

2. The only unfortunate aspect of our stay was the mandatory valet parking which cost $31.

"Great Experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/24/2012 Vote

3. unfortunately, the hotel restaurant Panzano's was closed on the one night we were there, Jan.

"very nice hotel in a good location, only problem is with the wifi " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2012 Vote

4. unfortunately, the renovations did not include better soundproofing in the windows, nor did they bother to clean the window sills before adding the additional pane of glass.

"It's not my favorite Kimpton property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/27/2011 Vote

5. unfortunately, nothing else was available and I was forced to endure a night of car horns and sirens and drunken wedding guests mistaking my room for their own.

"It's not my favorite Kimpton property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/27/2011 Vote

6. unfortunately, the pause, rewind, and fast-forward buttons on the remote all turn the TV on or off.

"Great pet-friendly hotel, TV did not work correctly. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/10/2011 Vote

7. unfortunately, on our first day, there were so many persons there waiting for the "freebies" that there was no place to sit and all of the food was quickly gone.

"Very Nice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/9/2009 Vote

8. And unfortunately I think this was a case of clientele not only expecting to be treated like 'rock stars' or VIP (which the hotel staff does a good job of helping you live that image) but acting like them as well.

"Nice boutique, not for business travelers " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2008 Vote

9. But unfortunately I ran into some problems.

"Nice boutique, not for business travelers " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2008 Vote

10. Room was interesting, but didn`t make me feel pampered, unfortunately.

"Pretty good " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2008 Vote