Venetian Hotel Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Poor

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Venetian Hotel Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

25th

Out of 481

Venetian Hotel Las Vegas	Average Price: $278 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3355 Las Vegas Blvd S

Las Vegas, 89109 View map

5-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 17
Average review rating: 4.15

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (27) , Expedia (100) , MyTravelGuide (2459) , Travelocity (175) , TripAdvisor (4423) , YahooTravel (554)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (99) avoid (88) awful (81) bad (328) bed bugs (41) big deal (48) broken (87) chipped (34) complain (211) complaint (168) crap (41) difficult (102) dirty (118) disappoint (393) disgust (36) downside (91) expensive (414) frustrated (40) hard (212) hardly (34) hassle (33) hate (33) horrible (79) issue (273) lack (90) loud (157) mistake (56) negative (152) noise (238) noisy (82) odor (35) overpriced (74) poor (117) pricey (131) problem (452) ridiculous (60) rock (50) rude (129) shock (47) sick (33) slow (114) smell (461) smoker (37) tacky (37) terrible (95) uncomfortable (34) unfortunate (86) worn (115) worst (79) wrong (112)

Poor	Appears in 201 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Poor:
bad (7) customer (8) desk (11) drink (10) expense (8) experience (10) food (16) good (8) hotel (51) lighting (23) liked (8) money (7) nice (9) not (32) park (8) pool (11) quality (19) room (36) service (73) suite (9)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Service was POOR - food was POOR and poorly prepared.

"Stunning Property - Sloppy Service - Avoid AquaKnox " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

2. With all of the effort put into the quality of the hotel, I am surprised at the poor service.

"Beautiful Hotel, Poor Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

3. They do provide a lit makeup mirror in the bathroom, but the poor lighting makes it difficult to get ready and look your best.

"Large rooms and nice amenities! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/4/2012 Vote

4. Small light fixtures with poor lighting qualities.

"Large rooms and nice amenities! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/4/2012 Vote

5. I did feel 'poor' sometimes as this hotel was a massive treat for our honeymoon and there were lots of people about with lots of money.

"A five star hotel but for the price, I have some niggles! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/25/2012 Vote

6. Due to the poor weather, the wife also spent some time at the spa and really enjoyed it.

"Really Nice Weekend " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

7. Additionally, their casino looks poor comparing with other casinos.

"Good hotel with a good price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

8. The hotel is confusing with poor signage.

"Very Nice/convenient " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/1/2012 Vote

9. I had trouble with the internet but didn't report it because it just wasn't that important at the time and most likely it was my poor excuse for a smart phone.

"Wonderful Stay... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote

10. The only reason I was willing to come back was because my best friend and I had a free night from our stay last year, due to poor customer service.

"Decent - But Still a Bit Underwhelmed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote