Hyatt Regency Austin, Austin, Difficult

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Hyatt Regency Austin

OpinionWell
Rank

5th

Out of 287

Hyatt Regency Austin	Average Price: $220 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

208 BARTON SPGS Road

Austin, 78704 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 23
Average review rating: 3.99

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (1179) , Travelocity (6) , TripAdvisor (314) , YahooTravel (19)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Renovation.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (5) annoy (6) avoid (10) bad (11) big deal (4) broken (4) complain (15) complaint (16) dated (8) depressing (3) difficult (7) dirt (3) disappoint (19) disturbing (3) downside (6) expensive (23) hard (7) hate (3) horrible (5) issue (24) lack (4) lazy (7) loud (17) miserable (3) mold (2) negative (15) noise (45) noisy (11) odor (3) overpriced (5) poor (4) pricey (13) problem (33) ridiculous (5) roach (4) rude (8) sad (3) sadly (4) scary (3) slow (10) smell (11) tiny (4) too small (4) unacceptable (2) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (10) unpleasant (2) worst (7) would have liked (2) wrong (5)

Difficult

Appears in 30 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Difficult:
bed (4) construction (9) double (2) entrance (2) good (3) hotel (10) internet (2) lake (3) liked (2) night (3) not (3) park (3) problem (2) queen (2) room (5) sleep (2) updated (2) useful (2) valet (2) view (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My only gripes are minor: (1) the phone in the room had an annoying hum, making it difficult to use,(b) the room service menu was rather limited, with no late-night options, (c) no shampoo in the bathroom upon arrival, and (d) a rather deformed ironing board.

"Sweet -- get a river view room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/9/2011 Vote

2. It would be difficult to find a worse view.

"Priceline nets us the ugliest room in the building... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/21/2011 Vote

3. We liked the fact that it had nice surroundings since it was situated on a lake and not too difficult a walk to downtown restaurants and entertainment.

"A Wonderful Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/16/2011 Vote

4. Other than on the deck, which of course becomes very hot, it is difficult to find a place to work.

"Nice hotel for business with only a few negatives " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/13/2011 Vote

5. What a fine job everyone did under very difficult circumstances.

"excellent service and responsiveness " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/1/2011 Vote

6. Quite a bit of noise from the atrium does make it into the room, making daytime napping difficult.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 3/17/2009 Vote

7. Construction made it difficult to get to.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 7/19/2008 Vote

8. Location was a little difficult to find, but central to Austin and had a great view of the river and access to Towne Lake running trails.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 4/2/2008 Vote

9. Overall good update, but the beds were DOUBLE,not queen which is difficult if can`t opt for the king.

"Nice update but some problems " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/16/2007 Vote

10. Overall good update, but the beds were DOUBLE,not queen which is difficult if can't opt for the king.

"Nice update but some problems " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/16/2007 Vote