Hilton Garden Inn Chelsea, New York City, Adequate

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Hilton Garden Inn Chelsea

OpinionWell
Rank

50th

Out of 676

Hilton Garden Inn Chelsea	Average Price: $336 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

121 West 28th Street

New York City, 10001 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 17 of 154
Average review rating: 4.43

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (39) , TripAdvisor (504)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (20) adequate (18) amazing (20) attentive (19) beautiful (18) best (71) better (47) big (72) cares (13) clean (331) comfortable (178) comfy (28) convenient (69) courteous (27) decent (37) efficient (14) excellent (79) exceptional (20) fabulous (11) fancy (12) fantastic (34) fast (19) free (136) fresh (46) friendly (225) fun (16) good (339) great (370) happy (37) helpful (226) huge (30) liked (118) love (49) new (222) nice (239) perfect (51) perfectly (13) pleasant (46) pleased (17) plenty (45) positive (20) professional (21) quiet (81) reasonable (38) reasonably (17) soft (15) spacious (43) spotless (17) welcoming (40) wonderful (41)

Adequate

Appears in 18 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Adequate:
bar (2) bed (4) breakfast (2) busy (2) clean (2) comfy (2) condition (2) elevator (3) luxurious (2) new (2) nice (2) noisy (2) not (6) room (14) size (5) small (4) standard (2) useful (2) wireless (2) workout (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The rooms were more than adequate in size by New York City standards and the beds were very comfortable.

"Great value and location for exploring New York City " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/26/2012 Vote

2. Room is adequate, actually decent size by New York standards (I have stayed in $300 rooms that were much smaller).

"Delightful Boutique Property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/9/2012 Vote

3. It is not overly luxurious by any means, but it is very adequate for a 3 star in every way.

"An excellent NY find at an excellent NY price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/20/2011 Vote

4. The overall impression of this place is that it is very conveniently located and more than adequate.

"Very Pleasant " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/5/2011 Vote

5. The rooms are small but adequate and clean.

"Boutique Hotel in the Flower District " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/29/2011 Vote

6. The room was small but adequate for NYC.

"Excellent service is the name lf the game at the Hilton Garden Inn, Chelsea " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2011 Vote

7. Rooms are of decent size and have adequate closets, drawers and desk.

"Nice hotel, convenient, reasonnably priced " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/15/2011 Vote

8. The rooms are adequate with comfy beds and nice linen although the air conditioning is certainly on the noisy side.

"The reviews are spot on... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/21/2010 Vote

9. The rooms are adequate with comfy beds and nice linen although the air conditioning is certainly on the noisy side.

"The reviews are spot on... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/21/2010 Vote

10. Maybe this is a ploy to get folks to the bar? Speaking of the bar/restaurant - it is not a happenin place but adequate for a drink and for breakfast.

"A respectful hotel at a reasonable price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/27/2010 Vote