Fairmont New Orleans, New Orleans, Stained

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Louisiana » New Orleans Destinations » New Orleans Hotels » Fairmont New Orleans

OpinionWell
Rank

7th

Out of 427

Fairmont New Orleans	Average Price: $242 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

123 Baronne Street

New Orleans, 70112 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 37
Average review rating: 3.69

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (66) , MyTravelGuide (83) , TripAdvisor (535)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (9) annoy (7) avoid (6) awful (11) bad (34) barely (5) big deal (8) complain (20) complaint (26) cramped (6) delay (4) difficult (6) dirt (4) dirty (16) disappoint (56) disturbing (4) downside (11) expensive (32) frustrated (4) hard (21) horrible (4) ignored (7) inconvenient (5) incorrect (5) issue (55) lack (15) loud (13) mad (5) mediocre (4) mistake (7) negative (22) noise (44) noisy (7) overpriced (5) poor (18) pricey (18) problem (61) roach (5) rude (15) shame (4) shock (7) slow (17) smell (17) sophisticated (4) stained (4) terrible (8) tiny (10) unfortunate (15) worst (7) wrong (21)

Stained

Appears in 10 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Stained:
bathroom (2) bed (4) carpet (4) hotel (2) old (4) room (4) sheets (7) sleep (2) stains (10)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The walls and carpet were stained.

"Worth a look but not a stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2012 Vote

2. Finally, at 2AM, after remaking the bed to not sleep on stained sheets I was able to go to sleep.

"One of the worst hotel experiences .... period. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2010 Vote

3. should place stained and incorrect sheets on the bed.

"One of the worst hotel experiences .... period. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2010 Vote

4. When pulling down the sheet of the bed I discovered one sheet was stained with ink and one 'sheet' was the wrong sheet (it was a duvet cover).

"One of the worst hotel experiences .... period. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2010 Vote

5. the sheets --- also (low thread count and flowery) and so did the bed spread (like the ones shown on dateline with the blacklight showing all kinds of stains etc.

"crappy hotel I should have stayed at a motel six " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/7/2005 Vote

6. the ceiling had water stains and all over and the molding around doors was horible.

"crappy hotel I should have stayed at a motel six " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/7/2005 Vote

7. The bathroom grout is majorly stained.

"Extremely disappointed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/21/2005 Vote

8. The room that I had first was dirty and old (stained carpets and chairs) but I was told this was the updated side of hotels and that rooms were larger.

"not a favorite " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/29/2005 Vote

9. The furniture in the rooms was old and outdated, the carpeting had many questionable stains that were unsightly, the bathroom needed a better shower, the TV was old and the remote didn`t work, the room had a musty smell to it, the hotel book was old and wornn out, etc.

"Great staff & location, needs updating " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2005 Vote

10. The carpets seemed clean and I didn`t notice any stains or tears mentioned in earlier posts.

"Good Location - Fair Prices " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/4/2004 Vote