Renaissance San Francisco, San Francisco, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Renaissance San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

46th

Out of 493

Renaissance San Francisco	Average Price: $226 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

905 California Street

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 24 of 37
Average review rating: 4.03

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (38) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (552) , YahooTravel (17)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (7) annoy (9) annoyance (3) avoid (6) awful (3) awkward (3) bad (20) big deal (3) broken (3) complain (6) complaint (10) difficult (8) dirty (4) disappoint (23) disturbing (4) downside (9) expensive (47) hard (18) hassle (3) horrible (7) inconvenient (4) issue (12) lack (5) loud (9) mess (2) mistake (6) mold (3) negative (16) noise (71) noisy (30) outdated (4) outrageous (3) overpriced (8) poor (5) pricey (14) problem (35) ridiculous (5) rude (4) sad (2) sadly (4) shock (2) slow (12) smell (7) stained (8) terrible (11) ugly (3) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (7) would have liked (4) wrong (6)

Bad	Appears in 37 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
area (4) breakfast (4) cable (3) car (5) continental (2) experience (2) good (4) hotel (9) location (3) noise (3) not (14) old (3) park (2) problem (3) quiet (2) rating (2) room (9) small (2) street (2) walking (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The views from Nob Hill are tremendous and it is an easy walk downhill to Union Square and not too bad walking back up.

"Great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/25/2012 Vote

2. Not a bad area very near China town.

"Frantic few days :) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/21/2012 Vote

3. This wouldn't be so bad if I hadn't reconfirmed the bill when I left, which i did.

"Nice Hotel, Poorly run " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/11/2011 Vote

4. Walking around the hilly, but quiet, neighborhood really wasn't that bad but we were blessed with great weather all week.

"Nice hotel, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/10/2011 Vote

5. All in all place is not bad and I was just shocked at the total price.

"Nothing included. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/5/2011 Vote

6. The place was not bad at all, and they had no problem with 5 of us staying in a single queen room, they brought us a rollaway and that was very nice of them.

"Nothing included. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/5/2011 Vote

7. Too bad, we probably would have eaten in the hotel or had room service if they did.

"Another nice stay; a few misses though " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/29/2011 Vote

8. I usually stay at Renaissance Hotels for my work related trips because I've never had a bad time and can completely focus on my work and meeting.

"Good for work trips! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/8/2011 Vote

9. bad food.

"Nice hotel... On the top of a hill. Street cars can be loud if your window is looking out over the street. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/8/2011 Vote

10. The only bad thing in this hotel is the breakfast, because have a menu, and it isn't a continental breakfast, and I think that all of this type of hotel must have a continental breakfast.

"Perfect hotel, perfect location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2011 Vote