Cartwright Hotel San Francisco, San Francisco, Barely

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Cartwright Hotel San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

78th

Out of 493

Cartwright Hotel San Francisco	Average Price: $194 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

524 Sutter Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 37 of 110
Average review rating: 4.05

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (38) , MyTravelGuide (2) , Travelocity (11) , TripAdvisor (423) , YahooTravel (18)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (4) annoy (3) arrogant (2) avoid (4) awful (3) bad (14) barely (5) big deal (3) broken (3) complaint (8) cramped (10) crap (2) difficult (2) disappoint (10) downside (9) dusty (2) expensive (16) hard (12) issue (8) lack (3) loud (9) miserable (2) misleading (2) negative (6) noise (53) noisy (22) outdated (2) outrageous (2) overpriced (3) poor (2) problem (23) roach (2) rough (2) rude (10) shabby (5) shock (4) slow (6) smelly (2) tacky (2) terrible (2) tiny (28) too small (7) uncomfortable (3) unfortunate (2) unfriendly (3) unhelpful (3) weird (2) worst (3) would have liked (2) wrong (4)

Barely

Appears in 9 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Barely:
bath (2) bathroom (2) closet (2) luggage (2) narrow (2) not (6) personable (2) room (11) tiny (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. barely one person can be in the bath-closet (it is not a room) at one time.

"Claustraphobia " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/13/2010 Vote

2. barely one person can be in the bath-closet (it is not a room) at one time.

"Claustraphobia " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/13/2010 Vote

3. We stayed in room 206 which was at the end of a narrow passageway - barely wide enough to carry our luggage.

"Lipstick on a pig " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/11/2010 Vote

4. We stayed in room 206 which was at the end of a narrow passageway - barely wide enough to carry our luggage.

"Lipstick on a pig " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/11/2010 Vote

5. You could barely turn around in the bathroom and had to step over the toilet to get out the shower.

"Good location but not worth the money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/30/2009 Vote

6. As of this past weekend the lounge area in the Lobby was completely closed off, many of the rooms were still fully bare and being worked on during the day.

"Great Location, Average hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2008 Vote

7. The A/C barely worked and when we checked in the overhead ceiling did not work.

"hotel under construction " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/28/2007 Vote

8. ) Once we got to our room it was obvious that there was NO WAY a rollaway bed or cot could ever fit anywhere in this tiny room - there was barely room for three people to stand.

"Rooms so small we had to get two " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/5/2006 Vote

9. Unfortunately, the pictures did not convey that the hotel was under construction, the rooms were tiny, the bathroom barely left you room to stand, the walls were sadly in need of new paint in the rooms and the hallways, and worst of all, the elevator was not operational [and apparently had been that way for months and will not be repaired for several more months].

"Mislead by their website " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/6/2004 Vote