InterContinental Chicago, Chicago, Pricey

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » InterContinental Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

36th

Out of 415

InterContinental Chicago	Average Price: $313 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

505 North Michigan Avenue

Chicago, 60611 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 18 of 39
Average review rating: 3.86

OpinionWell Value Index: 7

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (6) , Expedia (35) , MyTravelGuide (2256) , Travelocity (26) , TripAdvisor (873) , YahooTravel (48)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (9) annoy (19) avoid (11) awful (9) bad (73) bed bugs (8) big deal (12) broken (12) complain (24) complaint (36) cramped (16) dated (17) difficult (9) dirty (18) disappoint (78) disturbing (8) downside (7) expensive (80) hard (40) horrible (14) inconvenient (7) issue (49) lack (13) loud (31) mistake (12) negative (29) noise (50) noisy (24) outdated (7) outrageous (11) overpriced (9) peeling (16) poor (22) poorly (12) pricey (32) problem (67) ridiculous (14) rock (8) rude (24) shock (12) slow (37) smell (26) terrible (22) tiny (22) uncomfortable (9) unfortunate (14) unfriendly (6) worn (14) worst (13) wrong (21)

Pricey

Appears in 82 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Pricey:
$ (16) bar (5) breakfast (8) buffet (7) car (3) excellent (3) food (6) good (10) great (5) hotel (17) location (4) nice (7) night (7) park (24) prompt (5) quality (3) room (16) service (15) valet (12) well (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. What is really pricey about the hotel is the parking.

"Location, Location, Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/20/2012 Vote

2. Although it is a little bit pricey, the quality and location of the hotel is worth the money.

"Wonderful hotel in the perfect location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2012 Vote

3. We had a SCRUMDIDDILLIUMPTIOUS dinner at the Michael Jordan's Steakhouse in the hotel, but be warned that it is extremely pricey.

"Wonderful Weekend at the Intercontinental " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/6/2012 Vote

4. My advice, Chicago is pricey anyways.

"where service is an inconvenience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2012 Vote

5. Michael Jordan's restaurant is in the lobby and it is good although pricey BUT the bartenders make really good cocktails and are very knowledgeable on their craft as well.

"where service is an inconvenience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2012 Vote

6. A tad pricey but to be expected for the location.

"Good location, friendly personnel, clean facility " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/30/2012 Vote

7. I would agree with others that it is a little pricey but it is Chicago.

"Great location and beautiful pool area! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/6/2011 Vote

8. Very pricey and limited room service menu.

"Pricey but overall a good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/31/2011 Vote

9. was nice for a quiet night-cap after a long day sight-seeing but drinks are pricey .

"Great location...nice decor " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/12/2011 Vote

10. Parking was very pricey and we used a salf park station behind the hotel for overnight parking at $25 rather than the $55 the Hotel charges, but teh hotel allowed multiple re-entry valet parking.

"Great Hotel in best location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/20/2011 Vote