Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » InterContinental Chicago
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
36th
Out of 415

InterContinental Chicago

Average Price: $313  
 
Hotel Class:
505 North Michigan Avenue
Chicago, 60611 View map  
4-Star Hotel Rank: 18 of 39
Average review rating: 3.86
OpinionWell Value Index: 7
Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (6) , Expedia (35) , MyTravelGuide (2256) , Travelocity (26) , TripAdvisor (873) , YahooTravel (48)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Horrible
Appears in 27 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Horrible:
$ (4)   cost (2)   delighted (2)   expense (2)   hotel (5)   impressed (4)   much (2)   nicer (2)   not (4)   park (4)   room (10)   service (3)   small (4)   staff (3)   view (4)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
See all
1. The bell service was horrible.
"Easy location, bell service horrible. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/22/2012 Vote      
2. This InterContinental Chicago hotel is really horrible.
"Really Horrible " Read full review on TripAdvisor   10/16/2011 Vote      
3. The view was absolutely horrible, saw the top of some roof, but was in the historic tower.
"Just average this time " Read full review on TripAdvisor   7/20/2011 Vote      
4. Pros: Nice indoor pool, good locationCons: AWFULLY unprofessional staff, VERY small room, horrible value, $18 for WifiDo yourself a favor and stay someplace else.
"A disgrace to the Intercontinetal Brand: motel-level service for a 4 star price " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/19/2011 Vote      
5. There wasn't anything really horrible about this hotel, I just didn't see anything great enough to justify the cost.
"expensive, but not much to offer " Read full review on TripAdvisor   4/8/2011 Vote      
6. The rooms (although they said that they were newly remodeled) were horribly and sparsely decorated.
"Great Location - Historic Rooms are large but the views are only fair... " Read full review on TripAdvisor   6/8/2010 Vote      
7. Khan salvaged what started horribly.
"What Started Horribly, Ended Better... " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/27/2010 Vote      
8. Our room was tiny, and while that's not entirely a surprise in urban hotels, it was furnished horribly for its small size.
"Fabulous city. Disappointing hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   12/13/2009 Vote      
9. We took two recommendations from the concierge on where to eat dinner, both restaurants were horrible.
"Great location, nice hotel " Read full review on Expedia   10/6/2009 Vote      
10. Not horrible, but it was quite humid out and that 72 felt warmer because of it.
"Historic Hotel with some flaws " Read full review on TripAdvisor   6/29/2009 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved