AQUA Bamboo and Spa, Honolulu, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Hawaii » Honolulu Destinations » Honolulu Hotels » AQUA Bamboo and Spa

OpinionWell
Rank

9th

Out of 165

AQUA Bamboo and Spa	Average Price: $81 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2425 KUHIO AVENUE

Honolulu, 96815 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 20
Average review rating: 3.67

OpinionWell Value Index: 10

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (113) , MyTravelGuide (53) , Travelocity (46) , TripAdvisor (905) , YahooTravel (68)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (7) annoy (14) avoid (12) awful (6) bad (64) big deal (7) broken (14) bug (11) chipped (10) complain (23) complaint (17) cramped (6) dated (23) difficult (16) dirty (26) disappoint (48) downside (14) expensive (37) gross (6) hard (25) hardly (12) hassle (9) horrible (8) inconvenient (7) issue (36) loud (54) mildew (9) mistake (6) negative (29) noise (187) noisy (97) outdated (12) overpriced (6) poor (19) pricey (6) problem (100) roach (23) rock (8) rude (23) scary (7) shabby (6) slow (10) smell (48) terrible (13) tiny (40) uncomfortable (14) unfortunate (13) worn (16) worst (11) wrong (13)

Bad	Appears in 101 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
bathroom (4) bed (4) carpet (6) floor (8) free (5) good (13) great (5) hotel (27) liked (7) need (7) noise (12) not (35) park (5) pool (4) price (5) reviews (10) room (26) service (5) small (5) smell (13)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The only bad thing was there was construction going on, on the balconies facing the pool so there was some noise from this from 9am - 5pm daily.

"average hotel for decent price in good location... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

2. If we stayed in that original small room on the 11th floor then this review would not be so great (the hallway of that floor also had a bad smell to it).

"Reasonable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

3. She had an attitude like it was our fault, and that we should feel bad for bringing our problem to her (I actually hesitated going to front desk because she might be there) Needless to say, I had to call again and someone came up.

"Roaches " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/18/2012 Vote

4. Our 7th floor east room was bad.

"UPGRADE to poolside.Above floor 9. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

5. Each room was a little different with its own good and bad points but both were very clean .

"would return, very pleasant " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/9/2012 Vote

6. The traffic noise was so bad that we had to leave the ancient and moldy airconditioner stay on all the time.

"loud and old " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2012 Vote

7. It could have been really bad mildew but it smelled more like sewage.

"Room quality average, Major construction work, Good Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2011 Vote

8. There are alterations being done and the noise is sometimes quite bad.

"Location execellent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/9/2011 Vote

9. Not a fantastic hotel, but definitely not bad either.

"Good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/22/2011 Vote

10. It wasn't necessarily a bad smell, but it was so strong, you felt like you were living inside a York Peppermint Patty.

"Odd hotel, but it's okay & clean if looking for cheap. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/9/2011 Vote