Hotel Washington, Washington DC, Poor

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Hotel Washington

OpinionWell
Rank

17th

Out of 279

Hotel Washington	Average Price: $470 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

515 15th Street NorthWest

Washington DC, 20004 View map

0-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 154
Average review rating: 2.7

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (7) , TripAdvisor (441) , YahooTravel (10)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (4) annoy (16) avoid (9) awful (5) awkward (5) bad (29) big deal (5) broke (6) complain (15) complaint (13) cramped (9) difficult (5) dirty (7) disappoint (40) disturbing (5) expensive (40) flaws (5) frustrated (8) hard (20) hassle (7) horrible (9) ignored (4) inconvenient (5) issue (30) lack (12) loud (37) negative (11) noise (41) noisy (31) outrageous (4) overpriced (12) poor (17) poorly (5) pricey (10) problem (45) ridiculous (7) rock (8) rude (14) sadly (4) shame (6) shock (5) slow (13) terrible (13) tiny (30) uncomfortable (12) unfortunate (9) unhelpful (5) weird (11) worst (17) wrong (12)

Poor	Appears in 21 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Poor:
bar (4) design (2) drink (2) experience (4) food (2) hotel (10) lighting (2) liked (2) night (2) noise (2) not (2) price (2) rating (3) reviews (2) room (7) service (7) shower (2) sink (2) staff (3) value (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The service rating below will be poor but like I said front desk staff was top notch.

"VERY DISAPPOINTING " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

2. Yet this hotel was a poor imitation.

"Its not a typical W " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

3. The hotel complained they were overwhelmed by demand, but that is poor management.

"Overwhelmed - not us, the hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/18/2012 Vote

4. I've read a few reviews and while I had some similar experiences with poor lighting, and loud music in the lobby bar at night, we had a gigantic room.

"A Fine Stay for One Day in DC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/16/2011 Vote

5. The hotel's poor rating is based on overall experience for value.

"Apparently a great nightclub but not a great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/6/2011 Vote

6. We had a series of poor service experiences on our Saturday which included not being able to get a cup of coffee to save our lives.

"Apparently a great nightclub but not a great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/6/2011 Vote

7. I also didn't like how our room didn't have a double sink and the lighting around the sink was poor.

"Nice stay, but they're trying way too hard. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/5/2011 Vote

8. Food was awful and service in restaurant and bar very poor.

"Huge waste of money - terrible experience at the W Washington DC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/23/2011 Vote

9. The design of room was poor - the shower left standing water in the entry way creating a slick hazard, the shower floor was also slippery and the bathroom (which is essentially in the entry way) was not private at all.

"Huge waste of money - terrible experience at the W Washington DC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/23/2011 Vote

10. poor ventilation, but then, it's in the basement, so.

"Ideal location, best concierge ever " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/17/2011 Vote