Sheraton Fisherman's Wharf Hotel, San Francisco, Amenity

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Sheraton Fisherman's Wharf Hotel

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

27th

Out of 493

Sheraton Fisherman's Wharf Hotel	Average Price: $232 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2500 Mason Street

San Francisco, 94133 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 17 of 37
Average review rating: 3.47

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (89) , MyTravelGuide (1338) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (975) , YahooTravel (41)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (20) bar (80) bath (24) bathroom (219) beach (36) bed (159) breakfast (178) charge (60) check in (101) check out (24) complimentary (24) concierge (110) cost (70) deal (36) decor (88) dinner (32) discount (19) downtown (28) fee (42) food (120) front desk (89) hotel (1556) housekeeping (29) lobby (196) location (609) manager (41) money (60) parking (297) pillow (19) pool (122) price (143) rate (57) recommend (124) restaurant (172) room (1510) room service (28) service (184) shower (58) shuttle (19) staff (412) street (205) suite (33) to park (22) towel (26) valet (42) valet parking (23) value (40) view (79) walk (232) wireless (97)

Amenity

Appears in 20 comments.

85% wrote positive comments about amenity

The following words were used in comments with Amenity:
clean (4) decent (2) decorate (3) great (2) hotel (6) informative (2) location (2) modern (2) need (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The rooms were well decorated, with a great array of amenities.

"Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

2. The room was clean with good sheets and decent amenities.

"Great location, nice stay on a busy weekend " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/28/2012 Vote

3. I wouldn't recommend if you are looking for a luxurious accommodation with a lot of amenities, but if you need a convenient, comfortable place to stay, this is it.

"GREAT location...otherwise OK " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/16/2011 Vote

4. When will hotels understand that a business traveler is drawn by location, bed, shower and business related amenities (which include a decent iron and board).

"Not great for a business traveler... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/10/2011 Vote

5. For $279 per night, the amenities should be exceptional.

"Good location - poor value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/10/2011 Vote

6. A 5-min walk to Pier 39, lots of restaurants and other amenities like Walgreens.

"Good location but some rooms can be noisy. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/27/2011 Vote

7. The decor, staff and amenities were great.

"Great Warf Hotel " Read full review on Expedia 12/30/2009 Vote

8. However, if you have any sort of serious discount on your room, be prepared for the front desk to not be as helpful when it comes to the usual free amenities associated with hotels.

"Extra costs don't make the stay worthwhile " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/26/2009 Vote

9. This is more of a modern hotel with upgraded amenities.

"Good Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2012 Vote

10. The room was clean, but never had a book or tv interface to explain the amenities or where anything in the hotel is located.

"instructions not included " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/12/2011 Vote