Milford Plaza at Times Square, New York City, Better

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Milford Plaza at Times Square

OpinionWell
Rank

186th

Out of 676

Milford Plaza at Times Square	Average Price: $176 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

700 Eigth Avenue

New York City, 10036 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 32 of 144
Average review rating: 3.74

OpinionWell Value Index: 8

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (44) , TripAdvisor (829)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (16) adequate (39) affordable (18) best (89) better (124) big (86) brilliant (21) cares (43) cheaper (22) clean (568) cleanliness (18) comfortable (162) comfy (40) convenient (55) cool (29) courteous (19) decent (44) efficient (28) excellent (107) exceptional (22) fabulous (19) fantastic (57) fast (20) free (84) fresh (37) friendly (246) fun (16) good (394) great (449) happy (37) helpful (211) huge (39) liked (211) love (48) new (449) nice (214) perfect (87) perfectly (18) pleasant (43) pleased (20) plenty (44) positive (43) quiet (37) reasonable (47) reasonably (18) secure (25) spacious (20) spotless (15) welcoming (17) wonderful (41)

Better

Appears in 123 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Better:
$ (4) bathroom (4) change (5) expectation (5) floor (4) good (4) hotel (29) location (20) money (6) much (26) new (7) not (18) price (15) renovation (7) room (37) service (4) staff (5) suite (4) value (5) view (5)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. This hotel could not have been better suited for our needs.

"No troubles, at all " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2012 Vote

2. They changed our room and put in a much bigger and much better without second word.

"Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

3. Johns Pizzeria on 44th/8th or better still Bleeker St.

"To choose or not to choose, that is the question! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/4/2012 Vote

4. What's the betting, if they respond to this, management will be 'very sorry' and promise to look after us better next time? Don't give these people your money.

"Thanks for stealing... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

5. The pay phones aren't much better - three times we tried it and three times the coins got stuck.

"Thanks for stealing... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

6. The room was better than I expected.

"Great value, Great location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/30/2012 Vote

7. However on request we were moved to a much bigger room on the 9th floor which was at the front of the building which we found much better.

"Sight Seeing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

8. The location couldn't be better - on 8th Avenue - one block from Time Square - and next to Restaurant Row between 8th and 9th Avenues.

"Pleasantly surprised! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

9. Only a few complaints: when I got to the room I found that someone had used the toilet; there was ventilator noise coming from outside, but that was better than using the AC, which rattled; and the toilet paper holder was broken (which I forgot to tell the desk about).

"Great location for the money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

10. When they do, I think this will be an even better value.

"Pleasantly Surprised " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2012 Vote